Practical Considerations for Engaging Youth With Lived And/or Living Experience of Substance Use as Youth Advisors and Co-Researchers

Author:

Turuba Roxanne1ORCID,Irving Sarah1,Turnbull Haley1,Amarasekera Anurada1,Howard Amanda Madeleine1,Brockmann Violet1,Tallon Corinne1,Mathias Steve1,Henderson Joanna2,Barbic Skye3

Affiliation:

1. Foundry

2. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

3. University of British Columbia

Abstract

Background Although youth participatory action research (YPAR) has been gaining popularity in the context of substance use research over the last decade, few studies report on how to apply these methods effectively with youth. To address this gap, this paper describes how we engaged youth as advisors and research assistants in a qualitative research study, as well as our key learnings and practical considerations for engaging youth with lived and/or living experience of substance use. Methods We applied YPAR methods by partnering with youth from across BC who have lived and/or living experience of substance use to form a project youth advisory that co-designed the research protocol and materials. Three members became youth research assistants to facilitate focus groups and qualitative interviews with other youth with lived/living experience and peer support workers who work with youth, and support with data analysis and the dissemination of research findings. Mid- and end-point surveys were distributed to evaluate and improve our youth engagement methods over the course of the study. Results The positive impact of engaging youth with lived/living experience over the course of the study was reflected by study participant responses to the quality and relevance of the focus group/interview questions and positive experiences with the youth facilitators. Youth partners also described developing new skills in research, group facilitation, leadership, communication, and professionalism. Lessons learned and considerations for engaging youth in substance use research included: an equitable hiring process; proper compensation; communication, transparency, and accountability; safe spaces; flexibility; and youth capacity building. Conclusion This study demonstrates varying ways of engaging youth with lived and/or living experience of substance in research and how youth contributions can improve the relevance, quality, and validity of the research. Lessons learned from this study can be applied by other researchers considering engaging youth with lived/living experience or other marginalized populations.

Publisher

University of Cincinnati - Office of Innovation and Community Engagement

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference31 articles.

1. A systematic review of youth participatory action research (YPAR) in the United States: Methodologies, youth outcomes, and future directions;Yolanda Anyon;Health Education & Behavior,2018

2. Action civics for promoting civic development: Main effects of program participation and differences by project characteristics;Parissa J. Ballard;American Journal of Community Psychology,2016

3. Participatory action research;F. Baum;Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health,2006

4. Community-based youth participatory research studies with a focus on youth and well-being: A systematic review;Cátia Branquinho;Journal of Community Psychology,2020

5. Opioid-related harms in Canada, December 2018,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3