A comparative study of structural variant calling in WGS from Alzheimer’s disease families

Author:

Malamon John S1,Farrell John J2,Xia Li Charlie34,Dombroski Beth A1ORCID,Das Rueben G1ORCID,Way Jessica5,Kuzma Amanda B1,Valladares Otto1,Leung Yuk Yee1,Scanlon Allison J1,Lopez Irving Antonio Barrera1,Brehony Jack1,Worley Kim C6ORCID,Zhang Nancy R4,Wang Li-San1,Farrer Lindsay A278ORCID,Schellenberg Gerard D1ORCID,Lee Wan-Ping1,Vardarajan Badri N9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2. Biomedical Genetics Section, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

3. Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine

4. Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

5. Broad Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

6. Human Genome Sequencing Center, and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine

7. Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

8. Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

9. Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center and Taub Institute of Aging Brain, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center

Abstract

Detecting structural variants (SVs) in whole-genome sequencing poses significant challenges. We present a protocol for variant calling, merging, genotyping, sensitivity analysis, and laboratory validation for generating a high-quality SV call set in whole-genome sequencing from the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project comprising 578 individuals from 111 families. Employing two complementary pipelines, Scalpel and Parliament, for SV/indel calling, we assessed sensitivity through sample replicates (N = 9) with in silico variant spike-ins. We developed a novel metric, D-score, to evaluate caller specificity for deletions. The accuracy of deletions was evaluated by Sanger sequencing. We generated a high-quality call set of 152,301 deletions of diverse sizes. Sanger sequencing validated 114 of 146 detected deletions (78.1%). Scalpel excelled in accuracy for deletions ≤100 bp, whereas Parliament was optimal for deletions >900 bp. Overall, 83.0% and 72.5% of calls by Scalpel and Parliament were validated, respectively, including all 11 deletions called by both Parliament and Scalpel between 101 and 900 bp. Our flexible protocol successfully generated a high-quality deletion call set and a truth set of Sanger sequencing–validated deletions with precise breakpoints spanning 1–17,000 bp.

Funder

HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging

Publisher

Life Science Alliance, LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3