Hunting for Bushmeat Threatens the Rich Wildlife of Korup National Park in Cameroon
-
Published:2024-05-17
Issue:3
Volume:12
Page:161-174
-
ISSN:2330-8591
-
Container-title:American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:AJAF
Author:
Ervis Manfothang1ORCID, Jerome Niki-Buroro2, Félicité Temgoua1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon 2. Department of Forestry, Higher Institute of Agronomy of Bertoua, Bertoua, Cameroun
Abstract
Studied bushmeat hunting in the southwest (cluster E) of the Korup National Park (KNP) to identify the various poaching methods, quantify bushmeat, and identify the various hunting routes and to elucidate the key factors of poaching within this protected area. To achieve this task, purposeful and random sampling methods were used for the selection of target communities and respondents for questionnaires administration. Socio-economic surveys that included interviews, focus group discussions, guided questionnaires, and biological survey methods were used to estimate the quantity of bush meat harvested, species preferences, different bush meat routes and poaching methods. A total of 2,252 animals has been recorded with the most hunted species in the group of mammals being (pangolin) <i>Phataginus</i> sp. (150), (putty-nosed monkey) <i>Cercopithecus nictitans</i> (111), (great blue turaco)<i> Corythaeola cristata </i>(134), and (dwarf crocodile)<i> Osteolaemus tetraspis </i>(70). The main poaching tools in order of importance were shotguns (36.2%) followed by wire snares (31.7%). The main bush meat route identified was between the southwestern area of KNP and Nigeria through Ekong Anaku village. The main poaching factors were the inadequate source of income generating activities and high demand for bush meat in neighboring Nigeria. In parallel to the socio-economic benefits of this sector and its impact on rural population, the sustainable management of these threats in this area needs to be managed so as to guarantee the food security of local populations. For this, the successful monitoring and management of bushmeat extraction and trade in this park is to necessitate a collaboration approach with Cross River National Park to ensure a full control. It also requires the development of the alternatives sources of income to communities around the park.
Publisher
Science Publishing Group
Reference45 articles.
1. Abernethy, K. A., Coad, L., Taylor, G., Lee, M. E., & Maisels, F. (2013). Extent and ecological consequences of hunting in Central African rainforests in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368: 20120303. 2. Astaras, C. (2009). Ecology and Status of the Drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus) in Korup National Park: Implications for Conservation. PhD dissertation, Georg-August-University of Göttingen. 287p. 3. Bennett, E. L., & Robinson, J. G. (2000). Hunting for sustainability: The start of a synthesis In: Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests, pp. 499519. Eds. J. G. Robinson and E. L. Bennett. Columbia University Press, New York. 4. Bennett, E. L., Blencowe, E., Brandon, K., Brown, D., Burn, R. W., Cowlishaw, G. U. Y., Davies, G., Dublin, H., Fa, J. E., Milner-Gulland, E. J., Robinson, J. G., Rowcliffe, J. M., Underwood, F. M., & Wilkie, D. S. (2007). Hunting for consensus: reconciling bushmeat harvest, conservation, and development policy and Central Africa. Conservation Biology, 21, 884–887. 5. Bobo, K. S., Kamgaing, E. O. W., Kamdoum, E. C., & Dzefack, Z. C. B. (2015). Bushmeat hunting in southeastern Cameroon: magnitude and impact on duikers (Cephalophus spp.). African Study Monographs, 51, 119–141.
|
|