Sex differences in patient journeys to diagnosis, referral, and surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: implications for equitable care

Author:

Hung Peter Shih-Ping1,Byeon Alana G.1,Noorani Alborz12,Walker Matthew R.3,Lorello Gianni R.4567,Hodaie Mojgan1389

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

2. MD Program, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

3. Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

4. Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network—Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

5. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

6. The Wilson Centre, University Health Network—Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

7. Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

8. Department of Surgery, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and

9. Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is an orofacial pain disorder that is more prevalent in females than males. Although an increasing number of studies point to sex differences in chronic pain, how sex impacts TN patients’ journeys to care has not been previously addressed. This study sought to investigate sex differences in patients’ journeys to diagnosis, referral, and treatment of TN within a large national context. METHODS Patients with classic TN (n = 100; 50 females and 50 males) were randomly selected through chart reviews at the largest surgical treatment center for TN in Canada for a cross-sectional study. Statistical tests, including Welch’s t-test, the chi-square test, Pearson’s correlations, and analyses of covariance, were conducted with Python. RESULTS Key discrepancies between sexes in access to care were identified. Females had a significantly longer referral time interval (average 53.2 months vs 20.4 months, median 27.5 months vs 11.0 months, p = 0.018) and total time interval (average 121.1 months vs 67.8 months, median 78.0 months vs 45.2 months, p = 0.018) than males, despite reporting higher pain intensity at referral. Although medically intolerant patients had a significantly shorter referral time interval than medically tolerant patients (average 13.0 months vs 41.0 months, median 6.0 months vs 17.0 months, p < 0.001), medically tolerant females had a significantly longer referral time interval than medically tolerant males (average 59.9 months vs 21.7 months, median 30.0 months vs 12.0 months, p = 0.017). No statistically significant differences were detected between the sexes for diagnostic time interval (average 63.3 months vs 43.0 months, median 24.0 months vs 24.0 months, p = 0.263) or treatment time interval (average 4.6 months vs 4.7 months, median 4.0 months vs 3.0 months, p = 0.986). CONCLUSIONS Critical sex differences in patients’ journeys to TN surgical treatment were identified, with females enduring considerably longer referral timelines and expressing significantly greater pain intensity than males at referral. Taken together, our findings suggest the presence of unconscious bias and discrimination against females and highlight the need for expediting TN treatment referral for female TN patients.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference37 articles.

1. The need for a Canadian pain strategy;Lynch ME,2011

2. Chronic pain in Canada—prevalence, treatment, impact and the role of opioid analgesia;Moulin DE,2002

3. Pain severity and the economic burden of neuropathic pain in the United States: BEAT Neuropathic Pain Observational Study;Schaefer C,2014

4. The costs and consequences of adequately managed chronic non-cancer pain and chronic neuropathic pain;Andrew R,2014

5. Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings;Fillingim RB,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3