Variability in neurosurgical management and associated comorbidities and complications among preterm patients with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in the United States

Author:

Cabacungan Erwin1,Adams Samuel2,Best Benjamin3,Foy Andrew B.3,Singh Avantika2,Cohen Susan S.1

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Pediatrics,

2. Neurology, and

3. Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) remains a major morbidity of premature birth resulting from intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). National consensus guidelines for the timing of surgical interventions are lacking, which leads to considerable variations in management among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Early intervention (EI) has been shown to improve outcomes, but the authors hypothesized that the timing from IVH to intervention affects the comorbidities and complications associated with PHH management. The authors used a large national inpatient care data set to characterize comorbidities and complications associated with PHH management in premature infants. METHODS The authors used hospital discharge data from the 2006–2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) to conduct a retrospective cohort study of premature pediatric patients (weight < 1500 g) with PHH. The predictor variable was the timing of the PHH intervention (EI ≤ 28 days vs late intervention [LI] > 28 days). Hospital stay data included hospital region, gestational age, birth weight (BW), length of stay (LOS), PHH treatment procedures, comorbidities, surgical complications, and death. Statistical analysis included chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Cox proportional hazards regression, logistic regression, and a generalized linear model with Poisson and gamma distributions. Analysis was adjusted for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and death. RESULTS Of the 1853 patients diagnosed with PHH, 488 (26%) had documented timing of surgical interventions during their hospital stay. More patients had LI than EI (75%). The patients in the LI group of patients had younger gestational age and lower BW. There were significant regional differences in the timing of treatment: hospitals in the West performed EI, whereas hospitals in the South performed LI, even after adjustment for gestational age and BW. The LI group was associated with longer median LOS and more total hospital charges compared with the EI group. More temporary CSF diversion procedures occurred in the EI group, whereas more permanent CSF-diverting shunts were placed in the LI group. Shunt/device replacement and complications did not differ between the two groups. The LI group had 2.5-fold higher odds of sepsis (p < 0.001) and almost 2-fold higher odds of retinopathy of prematurity (p < 0.05) than the EI group. CONCLUSIONS The timing of PHH interventions differs by region in the United States, whereas the association of potential benefits with treatment timing suggests the importance of national consensus guidelines. Development of these guidelines can be informed by data regarding treatment timing and patient outcomes available in large national data sets, which provide insights into comorbidities and complications of PHH interventions.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Risk factors for shunt malfunction in pediatric hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective cohort study;Riva-Cambrin J,2016

2. Treatment of posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus;Cohen S,2022

3. Neonatal posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus from prematurity: pathophysiology and current treatment concepts;Robinson S,2012

4. Trends in hospitalization of preterm infants with intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus in the United States, 2000–2010;Christian EA,2016

5. Preterm brain injury: germinal matrix-intraventricular hemorrhage and post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilatation;Leijser LM,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3