Affiliation:
1. Departments of Surgery and
2. Clinical Investigation Department and
3. Neurosurgery, Providence-Providence Park Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Southfield, Michigan; and
4. Department of Neurosurgery, Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia
Abstract
OBJECTIVEThis study was performed to determine whether decompression of penetrating spinal cord injury (SCI) due to explosive shrapnel leads to greater neurological recovery than conservative management.METHODSIn accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Defense Technical Information Center public site was conducted on May 2, 2016. Studies that described penetrating SCI with shrapnel as an etiology, included surgical and/or conservative management, and demonstrated admission and follow-up neurological status were eligible for inclusion in this study. Odds ratios were calculated for the overall effect of surgical treatment on neurological recovery. Funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias.RESULTSFive case series (Level IV evidence) met the study criteria, and 2 of them had estimable odds ratios for use in the Forest plot analysis. Among the patients from all 5 studies, 65% were injured by shrapnel, 25% by high-velocity bullet, 8% by low-velocity bullet, and 2% by an unknown cause. A total of 288 patients were included in the overall odds ratio calculations. Patients were stratified by complete and incomplete SCI. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in outcomes between surgical and conservative management in the complete SCI cohort or the incomplete SCI cohort. Overall rates of improvement for complete SCI were 25% with surgery and 27% with conservative treatment (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.44–2.61, p = 0.88); for incomplete SCI, 70% with surgery and 81% with conservative treatment (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.68–4.05, p = 0.26).CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrates no clear benefit to surgical decompression of penetrating SCI due predominantly to shrapnel. There is a considerable need for nonrandomized prospective cohort studies examining decompression and stabilization surgery for secondary and tertiary blast injuries.
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Reference82 articles.
1. Can surgery improve neurological function in penetrating spinal injury? A review of the military and civilian literature and treatment recommendations for military neurosurgeons;Klimo;Neurosurg Focus,2010
2. Blast injury research: modeling injury effects of landmines, bullets, and bombs;Hayda;Clin Orthop Relat Res (422),2004
3. An update on civilian spinal gunshot wounds: treatment, neurological recovery, and complications;Bumpass;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2015
4. Gunshot injuries of the spine—a review of 49 cases managed at the Groote Schuur Acute Spinal Cord Injury Unit;le Roux;S Afr J Surg,2005
5. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test;Egger;BMJ,1997
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献