In vivo accuracy of image guidance performed using optical tracking and optimized registration

Author:

Mascott Christopher R.1

Affiliation:

1. The Epilepsy Institute, Beacon Neurosciences, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Object Image guidance systems involving the use of frameless referencing of surgical space to compile volumetric imaging data sets recently have come into widespread use. Few studies have addressed the true intraoperative surgical accuracy (that is, the application accuracy) of these systems except in a subjective manner. Calculated accuracies given by the systems do not necessarily reflect true intraoperative accuracy. Methods To objectively assess the stereotactic accuracy of a frameless image guidance system using optical spatial referencing, the author analyzed postoperative magnetic resonance (MR) images after placement of depth electrodes for the investigation of epilepsy. Preoperative planning for the treatment of seven patients included implanting skull fiducial screws and obtaining computed tomography/MR fusion images by using ImMerge image fusion software on the StealthStation (Medtronic, Inc.). A total of 42 electrodes were placed. Postoperative volumetric MR images were fused with preoperative study images. The difference between the planned electrode trajectories and targets and the visualized electrodes was measured in stereotactic space. Conclusions The mean distance between the distal electrode contact and the distal end of the planned trajectory for the 42 targets was 3 ± 1.5 mm. The most common error was in depth. The author’s technique did not involve rigid skull fixation of electrodes because they were subsequently tunneled subcutaneously and later removed at the bedside of the patient. Errors in depth were known to be due to traction at the time of tunneling and not due to stereotactic factors. Correcting for depth along the electrode trajectory, the mean accuracy was found to be 2.4 ± 1 mm.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3