Affiliation:
1. Departments of Neurological Surgery,
2. Radiology,
3. Otolaryngology and Neuroscience, and
4. Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York; and
5. Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Oculoplastic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Minimally invasive endoscope-assisted approaches to the anterior skull base offer an alternative to traditional open craniotomies. Given the restrictive operative corridor, appropriate case selection is critical for success. In this paper, the authors present the results of three different minimal access approaches to meningiomas of the anterior and middle fossae and examine the differences in the target areas considered appropriate for each approach, as well as the outcomes, to determine whether the surgical goals were achieved.
METHODS
A consecutive series of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), supraorbital approach (SOA), or transorbital approach (TOA) for newly diagnosed meningiomas of the anterior and middle fossa skull base between 2007 and 2022 were examined. Probabilistic heat maps were created to display the distribution of tumor volumes for each approach. Gross-total resection (GTR), extent of resection, visual and olfactory outcomes, and postoperative complications were assessed.
RESULTS
Of 525 patients who had meningioma resection, 88 (16.7%) were included in this study. EEA was performed for planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sellae meningiomas (n = 44), SOA for olfactory groove and anterior clinoid meningiomas (n = 36), and TOA for spheno-orbital and middle fossa meningiomas (n = 8). The largest tumors were treated using SOA (mean volume 28 ± 29 cm3), followed by TOA (mean volume 10 ± 10 cm3) and EEA (mean volume 9 ± 8 cm3) (p = 0.024). Most cases (91%) were WHO grade I. GTR was achieved in 84% of patients (n = 74), which was similar to the rates for EEA (84%) and SOA (92%), but lower than that for TOA (50%) (p = 0.002), the latter attributable to spheno-orbital (GTR: 33%) not middle fossa (GTR: 100%) tumors. There were 7 (8%) CSF leaks: 5 (11%) from EEA, 1 (3%) from SOA, and 1 (13%) from TOA (p = 0.326). All resolved with lumbar drainage except for 1 EEA leak that required a reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS
Minimally invasive approaches for anterior and middle fossa skull base meningiomas require careful case selection. GTR rates are equally high for all approaches except for spheno-orbital meningiomas, where alleviation of proptosis and not GTR is the primary goal of surgery. New anosmia was most common after EEA.
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Subject
Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference41 articles.
1. Endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas;Fatemi N,2009
2. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations;Cavallo LM,2005
3. Surgical complications associated with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas;Cappabianca P,2002
4. Endoscopic management of anterior cranial fossa meningiomas;Woodworth GF,2011
5. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery;Cappabianca P,2008
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献