Durable responses at 24 months with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for nonsurgical refractory back pain

Author:

Patel Naresh P.1,Jameson Jessica2,Johnson Curtis3,Kloster Daniel4,Calodney Aaron5,Kosek Peter6,Pilitsis Julie7,Bendel Markus8,Petersen Erika9,Wu Chengyuan10,Cherry Taissa11,Lad Shivanand12,Yu Cong13,Sayed Dawood14,Goree Johnathan9,Lyons Mark K.1,Sack Andrew14,Bruce Diana11,Bharara Manish15,Province-Azalde Rose15,Caraway David15,Kapural Leonardo16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona;

2. Axis Spine Center, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho;

3. Midwest Pain Management Center, Overland Park, Kansas;

4. Crimson Pain Management, Overland Park, Kansas;

5. Texas Spine and Joint Hospital, Tyler, Texas;

6. Oregon Neurosurgery Specialists, Springfield, Oregon;

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York;

8. Department of Pain Management, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;

9. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas;

10. Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;

11. Department of Pain Management, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California;

12. Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;

13. Swedish Health Services, Seattle, Washington;

14. Department of Pain Management, University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas;

15. Clinical Research, Nevro Corp., Redwood City, California; and

16. Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the 24-month durability of pain relief, function, quality of life, and safety outcomes for patients with nonsurgical refractory back pain (NSRBP) treated with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) within a large, national, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS Following the completion of an RCT comparing high-frequency SCS plus CMM with CMM alone for the treatment of NSRBP, patients gave additional consent for a follow-up extension to 24 months. Presented is the cohort analysis of all patients treated with high-frequency SCS following the optional crossover at 6 months. The outcomes assessed to 24 months included responder rate of ≥ 50% pain relief measured according to the visual analog scale [VAS]), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), quality of life (EQ-5D 5-level [EQ-5D-5L]), opioid reduction. RESULTS Of the 125 patients who received a permanent implant, 121 completed the 12-month follow-up, 101 gave additional consent for extended follow-up, and 98 completed the 24-month follow-up. At 24 months after implantation, the mean back pain VAS score was reduced by 73% and the responder rate was 82%. ODI and EQ-5D-5L both improved by at least double the minimal clinically important difference for each measure. No unexpected adverse events were observed, and the rates of serious adverse events (3.4%) and device explantations (4.8%) were low. CONCLUSIONS The addition of high-frequency SCS to CMM in patients with NSRBP offers profound improvements at 24 months in pain, function, quality of life, and reduced opioid use. This study provides much-needed evidence to inform current clinical practice for managing patients with NSRBP.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015,2016

2. Epidemiology of chronic low back pain in US adults: data from the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey;Shmagel A,2016

3. Chronic pain in the emergency department: a pilot mixed-methods cross-sectional study examining patient characteristics and reasons for presentations;Poulin PA,2016

4. Diagnosis and management of low-back pain in primary care;Traeger A,2017

5. Current perspectives on neurostimulation for the management of chronic low back pain: a narrative review;Provenzano DA,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3