Comparison of intraoperative cone-beam CT versus preoperative fan-beam CT for navigated spine surgery: a prospective randomized study

Author:

Tu Tsung-Hsi12,Kuo Yi-Hsuan13,Chang Chih-Chang124,Kuo Chao-Hung124,Chang Hsuan-Kan125,Fay Li-Yu12,Yeh Mei-Yin126,Ko Chin-Chu12,Huang Wen-Cheng12,Wu Jau-Ching12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei;

2. School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei;

3. Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei;

4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei;

5. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei; and

6. Institute of Pharmacology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This prospective randomized study aimed to investigate the accuracy, radiation exposure, and surgical workflow optimization of a novel intraoperative spinal navigation system using preoperative fan-beam (FB) CT versus the classic intraoperative cone-beam (CB) CT in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS In this two-arm, single-center, randomized study, the authors evaluated the safety and clinical outcomes of a novel navigation system for pedicle screw placement in spine surgery. RESULTS The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the experimental group (FB group) was 94.38%, while it was 94.55% in the control group (CB group). Notably, the intraoperative radiation exposure to patients in the FB CT group (mean 0.361 ± 0.261 mSv) was significantly lower than that in the CB CT group (mean 6.526 ± 13.591 mSv) (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the intraoperative preparation time for screw placement in the FB group (mean 10.6 ± 5.62 minutes) was significantly lower than that in the CB group (mean 17.6 ± 5.59 minutes) (p = 0.0004). No significant differences were observed for blood loss during surgery, total radiation exposure to surgeons, mean time for inserting a single pedicle screw, revision surgery rate, patients’ reported outcomes, and length of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Significant differences were observed for intraoperative radiation exposure to patients and the preparation time for pedicle screw placement. CONCLUSIONS The preoperative FB CT-based intraoperative spinal navigation system demonstrated comparable accuracy and safety when compared with the intraoperative CB CT-based system. Moreover, the FB CT-based system had a shorter time for screw placement and reduced intraoperative radiation exposure to patients. These findings support the potential benefits of adopting this novel navigation system to enhance surgical precision and reduce radiation-related risks in MIS-TLIF procedures.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. Image guidance in spinal surgery: a critical appraisal and future directions;Sommer F,2021

2. Spinal navigation for minimally invasive thoracic and lumbosacral spine fixation: implications for radiation exposure, operative time, and accuracy of pedicle screw placement;Tajsic T,2018

3. Utilization trends and outcomes of computer-assisted navigation in spine fusion in the United States;Kelley BV,2021

4. Augmented reality-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation: a cadaveric feasibility and accuracy study;Chang CC,2022

5. History and advances in spinal neurosurgery;Walker CT,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3