Affiliation:
1. National University Hospital, Singapore
Abstract
Recently, a number of events occurred in the world of drug safety surveillance, also known as pharmacovigilance, which were mere blips on the radar screen of most readers of the daily newspapers. In September 2004, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), the manufacturer of the selective COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (Vioxx), voluntarily withdrew the drug from world markets. This action produced considerable anxiety among some of our patients with chronic pain, who had been taking rofecoxib regularly. With few exceptions, most patients had learnt from their doctors and from the Internet that the newer anti-inflammatory pain-modifiers, including rofecoxib and celecoxib, were apparently safer in terms of gastric mucosal injury, perforation of peptic ulcers, and bleeding.1-3 It is scant comfort to learn that other COX-2 inhibitors probably carry a similar pro-thrombotic risk.4
Publisher
Academy of Medicine, Singapore
Reference10 articles.
1. Anonymous. Are rofecoxib and celecoxib safer NSAIDs? Drug Ther Bull 2005;43:1-6.
2. Bresalier RS, Sandler RS, Quan H, Bolognese JA, Stat M, Oxenius B, et al. Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1092-102.
3. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, Wittes J, Fowler R, Finn P, et al. Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1071-80.
4. Drazen JM. COX-2 inhibitors – a lesson in unexpected problems. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1131-2.
5. Pharmacovigilance Unit. Suspension of product licence of Lipobay. Product Safety Alert 9 August 2001. Available at: http://www.hsa.gov.sg/cda/safetyalerts. Accessed 28 February 2005.