Smoking Cessation Apps: a Systematic Review of Format, Outcomes, and Features (Preprint)

Author:

Barroso-Hurtado MaríaORCID,Suárez-Castro DanielORCID,Martínez-Vispo CarmelaORCID,Becoña ElisardoORCID,López-Durán AnaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Behavioural interventions are effective for smoking cessation. However, they are not easily accessible for all treatment-seeking smokers. ICT (Information and Communication Technology) and, specifically, mobile health (mHealth) apps, have been used in recent years to overcome these limitations. Smoking cessation apps can be used combined with a face-to-face intervention (FFSC-Apps) or as general apps (GSC-Apps).

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this review were (1) to examine the effects of FFSC-Apps and GSC-Apps on abstinence, tobacco use, and relapse rates, and (2) to describe their features.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the internationally Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, using MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases to identify papers published up to 30th November 2020.

RESULTS

Of the total 6014 studies screened, 22 were included in this review, of which eight used GSC-Apps and 14 FFSC-Apps. Of the 22 studies, seven were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), four controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and 11 before-and-after studies. Also, 11 of the 22 studies were pilot studies. Regarding study quality, five were rated as strong, 12 as moderate, and five as weak. Regarding smoking cessation outcomes, two GSC-Apps studies obtained significant differences between conditions in abstinence rates (one of them obtained higher rates in the app condition) and two in cigarettes per day (CPD), with higher reduction rates in the app condition. None of the FFSC-Apps studies obtained significant differences in abstinence rates between conditions but two FFSC-Apps studies showed significant differences in abstinence rates at the different point-assessments. None of the included studies provided information about smoking relapse rates. Concerning apps features, the most frequently used in the FFSC-Apps studies were self-tracking and carbon monoxide (CO) measures and, in the GSC-Apps studies, they were self-tracking, setting a quit plan/quit date, motivational content, and smoking self-report.

CONCLUSIONS

Smartphone apps for smoking cessation are promising tools for quitting smoking. Although research in this area is at an early stage and more studies are needed to establish their efficacy, the high availability and usage of smartphone apps imply a great opportunity to complement traditional smoking cessation interventions and to reach large populations. In terms of public health, even if these interventions had a small effect size, they could have a relevant impact on improving health and reducing economic costs related to tobacco use.

CLINICALTRIAL

PROSPERO CRD42020154272; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020154272

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Nomophobia (No Mobile Phone Phobia) and Psychological Health Issues among Young Adult Students;European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education;2023-09-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3