Individuals’ Attitudes Toward Digital Mental Health Apps and Implications for Adoption in Portugal: Web-Based Survey (Preprint)

Author:

Nogueira-Leite DiogoORCID,Marques-Cruz ManuelORCID,Cruz-Correia Ricardo JoãoORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature is consensual regarding the academic community exhibiting higher levels of mental disorder prevalence than the general population. The potential of digital mental health apps for improving access to resources to cope with these issues is ample. However, studies have yet to be performed in Portugal on individuals' attitudes and perceptions toward digital mental health applications or their preferences and decision drivers on obtaining mental health care, mental health self-assessment, or mental health and its treatment. Our study aims at bridging these gaps by mapping the expectations of the demand side of digital mental health apps.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand the determinants of digital mental health applications use in the Portuguese context using the academic community of Porto as a proxy, along with potential adoption barriers and enablers of its use.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, web-based survey adapted to the Portuguese context was delivered via dynamic email to the University of Porto’s academic community. Data collection occurred between September 20 and October 20, 2022. We used structural equation modeling to build three models, replicating a previously peer-reviewed and published study and producing a full mediation model shaped by the collected data. This allowed us to test the relationships between the use of mental health apps, perceived stress, perceived need to seek help for mental health concerns, perceived stigma, past use of professional mental health services, privacy concerns, and social influence of other people in using digital mental health apps.

RESULTS

Of the 539 participants, 32 (5.9%) reported using digital mental health apps. Perceived stress was positively associated with mental health app use. A latent variable comprising perceptions of mental health problems and coping strategies in place was also positively related to this use. Privacy concerns regarding one’s information being accessible to others were negatively associated with digital mental health app use. Perceived stigma, need to seek help, and having close relationships did not have a statistically significant direct effect. Financial reasons (37.3%), the helpfulness of these apps (26.9%), uncertainty about the seriousness of one’s needs (26.3%), and waiting time to access mental health resources (24.9%) were the main barriers to access.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings can inform product and policy development of new, better-targeted digital mental health app interventions that enable the academic community to take a more targeted, evidence-based approach to the mental health needs of its members. The developers of these decisions should consider delivering these apps with low to no financial charges, offering evidence of their helpfulness and with a focus on the timely delivery of care. To further digital mental health app use, there is a need to shape mindsets through mental health literacy, namely regarding self-awareness of one’s conditions, acceptable stress levels, and overall behavior toward mental health.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-#41040 "Attitudes of physicians and individuals toward digital mental health tools: protocol for a web-survey-based research project"

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3