The Minimum Dataset for Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review (Preprint)

Author:

Bernardi Filipe AndradeORCID,Mello de Oliveira BibianaORCID,Bettiol Yamada DiegoORCID,Artifon MilenaORCID,Schmidt Amanda MariaORCID,Machado Scheibe VictóriaORCID,Alves DomingosORCID,Félix Têmis MariaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rare diseases are conditions characterized by having a low prevalence in the general population, but collectively, it is estimated that they can affect up to 10% of the world population. Thus, rare diseases have a significant impact on public health systems worldwide. However, data, information, and knowledge regarding diagnoses, processes, and treatments for such diseases generally do not have a validated structuration available for use in different health services, making exchanging and reusing informational elements a complex task. Thus, investigating a minimum data set for ​​rare diseases is the central aspect to consider in this study.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to identify the minimum data sets used for RDs in healthcare networks worldwide. Subsequently, analyze such findings against the Brazilian Policy for Comprehensive Care for People with Rare Diseases and the World Health Organization guidelines and recommendations. To suggest a general minimum data set for rare diseases to improve the standardization and interoperability of data about diagnostic and care processes in the rare diseases area.

METHODS

For this systematic review, we used the Population, Concept, and Context methodology to define the guiding question of the review, which seeks to identify and map the variables used in the minimum datasets in healthcare networks worldwide. Subsequently, we used the research question to create the search strategy according to the MeSH descriptors. We inserted the search strategy defined in the chosen databases to select the first set of studies. We screened these studies through their abstract and, after that, through the full-text reading phase. Considering the established eligibility criteria, we finalized the selection stage of the review studies. Subsequently, we extract data and information from these articles in a structured way, using synthesis and analysis methods, to answer the research question. Throughout the process, we used the Prisma Checklist to ensure the quality of each step of this study.

RESULTS

Initially, we identified 407 studies from the selected databases. After all screening steps, 20 studies were included in the systematic review. These studies encompass 8 different study designs. Most of the datasets identified and mapped came from projects on the European continent. Results referring to America and Asia were also found. The variables used in rare disease records worldwide were identified and extracted. Subsequently, we used data science methods and clinical experience to structure and recommend a fundamental minimum standardized dataset for use in rare disease patient records in healthcare networks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is a techno-social contribution that aims to consolidate a consistent information base for registering rare disease patients in health networks. To improve the ability to represent the real health scenario in each context of rare diseases. In addition to facilitating information sharing, health planning, and decision-making.

CLINICALTRIAL

CRD42021221593

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.034

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3