Development of artificial intelligence model for predicting in-hospital mortality derived from international classification of diseases, triage scales, procedure codes, and other clinical features in trauma patients: A nationwide population-based study (Preprint)

Author:

Lee Seung Seok,Kang Wu SeongORCID,Seo Sang HyunORCID,Kim Do WanORCID,Ko Hoon,Kim JoongseokORCID,Lee SeonghwaORCID,Lee JinseokORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma-related mortality is a heavy burden. Estimating the mortality risk in trauma patients is crucial to enhance treatment efficiency and reduce the burden. The most popular and accurate model is the injury severity score based on the abbreviated injury scale (AIS), which is an anatomical injury severity scoring system. However, the AIS requires specialists to code the injury scale by reviewing a patient's medical record; therefore, applying the model to every hospital is impossible.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict in-hospital mortality in trauma patients using the international classification of disease (ICD)-10, triage scale, procedure codes, and other clinical features.

METHODS

We used the Korean National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) dataset (n=778,111) from over 400 hospitals from 2016 to 2019. To predict in-hospital mortality, we used ICD-10; patient’s age; gender; intentionality; injury mechanism; emergent symptom; AVPU scale; Korean triage and acuity scale (KTAS); and procedure codes as input features. We proposed the ensemble of deep neural networks (EDNN) via five-fold cross-validation, and compared with other state-of-the-art machine learning models, including traditional prediction models. We further investigated the effect of features.

RESULTS

Our proposed EDNN with all features provided the highest AUROC of 0.9507, which outperformed other state-of-the-art models, including traditional prediction models: AdaBoost (AUROC of 0.9433), XGBoost (AUROC of 0.9331), ICD-based injury severity score (AUROC of 0.8699 an inclusive model and AUROC of 0.8224 an exclusive model), and KTAS (AUROC of 0.1841). In addition, using all features provided higher AUROC than any other partial features: EDNN with the features of ICD-10 only (AUROC of 0.8964) and EDNN with the features excluding ICD-10 (AUROC of 0.9383).

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed EDNN with all features outperforms other state-of-the-art models, including the traditional diagnostic code-based prediction model and triage scale.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3