Evaluating Factors that affect knowledge sharing among health care professionals in the medical imaging department in two cancer centres: A Concurrent Mixed Methods Approach (Preprint)

Author:

Almashmoum MaryamORCID,Cunnigham JammesORCID,Ainsworth JohnORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knowledge sharing is a crucial part of any knowledge management implementation. It refers to sharing skills and experience among team members in an organisation. In a healthcare setting, sharing knowledge, whether tacit or explicit is important and can lead to better healthcare services. In medical imaging departments, knowledge sharing can be of particular importance. There are several factors that affects knowledge sharing practices in the medical imaging departments: individual, departmental, and technological. Evaluating the importance of these factors and understanding their use can help with improving knowledge sharing practices in medical imaging departments.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the level of motivation, identify current knowledge sharing tools, and to evaluate factors affecting knowledge sharing in the medical image departments of two cancer centres, The Christie Hospital, UK and the Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC).

METHODS

A concurrent mixed methods study was conducted through non-probability sampling techniques between February 1, 2023, and July 30, 2023. Semi-structured interviews were used to validate the results of the sampling. Data was collected using an electronic questionnaire which was distributed among healthcare professionals using Qualtrics in both cancer centres. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online using Microsoft Teams. The quantitative data was analysed using Qualtrics MX software to report the results of each question, while the qualitative data was analysed using a thematic approach with codes classified through N-Vivo.

RESULTS

56 respondents participated from Kuwait Cancer Control Center (KCCC), and 29 from the Christie with a 100% response rate. 17 (58.6%) healthcare professionals from the Christie Daily shared their knowledge by using emails and face- to -face communication as main tools for knowledge sharing, and 32 (57.1%) from the KCCC used face -to -face communication for knowledge sharing. The mean value scores of Likert scale of all the components that assess the factors that affect knowledge sharing behaviours fell between Somehow Agree and Strongly Agree in both centres, excepting the extrinsic motivation, which was Neither Agree nor Disagree. Those results reflected the result related to the incentives. Those results reflected the result related to the incentives. It was shown that 15 (51.7%) had no incentives to encourage knowledge sharing practices. Therefore, setting clear policies to manage the incentives is important to increase knowledge sharing practices among them.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offered an evaluation of knowledge sharing factors in two cancer centres. Most of healthcare professionals are aware of the importance of knowledge sharing practices in enhancing healthcare services. Several challenges were identified such as time constraints, a lack of staff, and the languages barriers that limit of knowledge sharing practices. Therefore, setting a clear policy for knowledge sharing is vital to practicing knowledge sharing behaviours and facing any challenges that limit of this practice.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3