Millennials Seeking Healthcare: Examining the Degree to Which Patients Utilize Online Resources (Preprint)

Author:

Arensberg LandonORCID,Kalender-Rich Jessica,Lee Jaehoon,Gibson Cheryl

Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to the 2020 US Census, a Silver Tsunami is looming with more than 75.4 million persons aged 57-75 (known as “Baby Boomers”) expected to need more costly medical care. Future estimates, however, indicate a much larger wave of individuals is imminent, given the 83.1 million Millennials approaching adulthood who will be seeking medical care. Because Millennials differ from Baby Boomers in several ways, it is important to understand how this population finds their physician to gain insight into what might influence this decision.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the extent and influence online resources and reviews have on the younger generation as compared to elder generations.

METHODS

Between the months of May and July 2020 a cross-sectional paper-based survey was conducted at primary care and geriatric clinics located within a large urban academic medical center in the Midwest.

RESULTS

A sample of 284 patients completed the survey (44.35 ± 17.54 yrs old [range=18-90], 60.6% female, 57.4% white). Of Millennials (respondents aged 22-38 yrs), 67.2% read online reviews before choosing a physician. Millennials were significantly more likely to read online reviews before choosing a physician (P=0.004) and utilize online resources to search for a new physician (P<.001) than older patients. The majority of millennials were likely to be influenced by both negative reviews (59%) and positive reviews (71.3%). Female patients were more likely to read online reviews and use online resources compared to men, but the differences were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, Millennials are much more likely to research online reviews before choosing a physician. Other generations also use online resources to an extent but tend to use personal referrals. Across all age groups, negative online reviews were less influential in decision-making compared to positive ones. Therefore, a presence on review websites and search engines seems to only benefit one’s medical practice to capture the new wave of patients.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3