StAMP Stimulating physical activity in Solution Focused Group therapy for military (ex)personnel: Effect on therapy outcome measures (Preprint)

Author:

Klein M.G.ORCID,Kouwer K.ORCID,Leen N.A.ORCID,op ten Noort C.B.ORCID,Geuze S.G.ORCID,de Weijer A.D.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical activity interventions with wearable devices may have beneficial effects on mental-health outcomes. Only a small number of studies explored the application of such devices in mental healthcare. Therefore, more evidence is required to understand its potential effectiveness and for whom it might be most beneficial. Furthermore, barely any research has been conducted on using wearable devices in relation to physical activity within a group therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This pioneering study therefore aimed to examine the effects of wearing an activity tracker on treatment outcome and stimulating physical activity in an existing group therapy.

METHODS

Participants with mental illness enrolled in a 6 to 12 weeks solution-focused group therapy (SFG) were given a Fitbit Charge 3 combined with a goalsetting protocol. Outcome measures (COPE-EASY & ORS) were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Comparisons were made between an experimental group, wearing a Fitbit, and a control group that consisted of participants who completed the SFG without the Fitbit. Additionally, physical activity levels were objectively assessed for the experimental group at baseline and after each weekly SFG-session using the Fitbit Charge 3.

RESULTS

Although both experimental group and control group showed a significant improvement in therapy outcome measures, no significant effect on active coping was found between both groups. Furthermore, physical activity during SFG did not increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal no direct benefits of wearing a Fitbit for mental health, nor does it stimulate physically active behavior during SFG combined with a goal-setting protocol.

CLINICALTRIAL

This study was not subject to the national Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). This has been declared by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Utrecht (MREC), therefore medical-ethical review was not required.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3