Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review (Preprint)

Author:

Lapp LindaORCID,Egan KierenORCID,McCann LisaORCID,Mackenzie Moira,Wales Ann,Maguire RomaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the considerable potential of digital health approaches to help with continued staff shortages and improve quality of care, digital innovations are yet to make real impacts in the care home sector. To understand the current landscape of digital innovation in long-term care facilities, such as nursing and care homes, it is important to find out which clinical decision support tools are currently used in long-term care facilities, what their purpose is, how these were developed, and what types of data these tools use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to analyze studies which evaluated clinical decision support tools in long term care facilities to contribute to the existing scientific evidence to inform a roadmap for digital innovation, specifically for clinical decision support tools, in long-term care facilities.

METHODS

A review of the published literature between 1st of January 2010 to 21st of July 2021 was conducted, using key search terms in three scientific journal databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library and the British Nursing Index. Only studies evaluating clinical decision support tools in long-term care facilities were included in the review.

RESULTS

In total, 17 papers were included in the final review. The found clinical decision support tools were evaluated for medication management, pressure ulcers, dementia management, falls, hospitalization, malnutrition, urinary tract infection, and COVID-19. In general, the found studies show that decision support can show improvements in delivery of care and in health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the studies demonstrate the potential of positive impact of clinical decision support tools, there is variability in results – due in part to the diversity of types of decision support tools, users, and contexts; limited validation of the tools in use; and in part to the lack of clarity in defining the whole intervention.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3