Digital Maturity as a Predictor of Quality and Safety Outcomes in US Hospitals: Cross-Sectional Observational Study (Preprint)
Author:
Snowdon AnneORCID, Hussein AbdulkadirORCID, Danforth MelissaORCID, Wright AlexandraORCID, Oakes ReidORCID
Abstract
BACKGROUND
This study demonstrates that digital maturity contributes to strengthened quality and safety performance outcomes in US hospitals. Advanced digital maturity is associated with more digitally enabled work environments with automated flow of data across information systems to enable clinicians and leaders to track quality and safety outcomes. This research illustrates that an advanced digitally enabled workforce is associated with strong safety leadership and culture and better patient health and safety outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to examine the relationship between digital maturity and quality and safety outcomes in US hospitals.
METHODS
The data sources were hospital safety letter grades as well as quality and safety scores on a continuous scale published by The Leapfrog Group. We used the digital maturity level (measured using the Electronic Medical Record Assessment Model [EMRAM]) of 1026 US hospitals. This was a cross-sectional, observational study. Logistic, linear, and Tweedie regression analyses were used to explore the relationships among The Leapfrog Group's Hospital Safety Grades, individual Leapfrog safety scores, and digital maturity levels classified as advanced or fully developed digital maturity (EMRAM levels 6 and 7) or underdeveloped maturity (EMRAM level 0). Digital maturity was a predictor while controlling for hospital characteristics including teaching status, urban or rural location, hospital size measured by number of beds, whether the hospital was a referral center, and type of hospital ownership as confounding variables. Hospitals were divided into the following 2 groups to compare safety and quality outcomes: hospitals that were digitally advanced and hospitals with underdeveloped digital maturity. Data from The Leapfrog Group's Hospital Safety Grades report published in spring 2019 were matched to the hospitals with completed EMRAM assessments in 2019. Hospital characteristics such as number of hospital beds were obtained from the CMS database.
RESULTS
The results revealed that the odds of achieving a higher Leapfrog Group Hospital Safety Grade was statistically significantly higher, by 3.25 times, for hospitals with advanced digital maturity (EMRAM maturity of 6 or 7; odds ratio 3.25, 95% CI 2.33-4.55).
CONCLUSIONS
Hospitals with advanced digital maturity had statistically significantly reduced infection rates, reduced adverse events, and improved surgical safety outcomes. The study findings suggest a significant difference in quality and safety outcomes among hospitals with advanced digital maturity compared with hospitals with underdeveloped digital maturity.
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Reference8 articles.
1. Health technology, quality and safety in a learning health system 2. Semantic Integration of Patient Data for Clinical Decision Support in Breast Cancer Care 3. Sigmund von Birken, Werke und Korrespondenz. Hg. von Klaus Garber, Ferdinand van Ingen, Hartmut Laufhütte, Dietrich Jöns und Johann Anselm Steiger. 14 Bde. in 29 Teilbden. (Neudrucke deutscher Literaturwerke N. F. 41 / 49 / 50 / 53,1 / 53,2 / 55 / 56 / 59 / 60 / 61 / 62 / 65 / 66 / 67 / 68 / 77 / 78 / 79 / 80 /81 / 82 / 83 / 84) Niemeyer, Tübingen 1988–2016, (Neudrucke deutscher Literaturwerke N. F. 90 / 91 / 93 / 94 / 95 / 96) De Gruyter, Berlin – Boston 2017–2018. 4. FIG. 1. Placement of KSKM tantalum included in the analyzed sample. Legend: 1–5 - KSKM types: 1 - pegmatite, 2 - granite, 3 - alkaline granite, 4 - foid, 5 - carbonatite; 6–10 - supercontinental cycles: 6 - Kenorian, 7 - Colombian, 8 - Rodinian, 9 - Pangean, 10 - Amazian. Deposits: 1 - Pilgangur, 2 - Vodzhina, 3 - Tanko, 4 - Rose, 5 - Bold Hill, 6 - Mount Dinz, 7 - Mount Cattlin, 8 - Greenbushes, 9 - Bikita, 10 - Arcadia, 11 - Kolmozerskoe, 12 - Volta Grande, 13 - Vishnyakovskoe, 14 - Goltsovoe, 15 - Katuginskoe, 16 - Brockman, 17 - Pitinga, 18 - Nechalacho, 19 - Mount Weld, 20 - Kamativi, 21 - Manono Kitotolo, 22 - Motzfeld, 23 - Tanbrez, 24 - Krevier, 25 - Kenticha, 26 - Tri-Aloez, 27 - Tastigskoye, 28 - Morrois, 29 - Marropino, 30 - Nanping, 31 - Alberta-1, 32 - Bakenoe, 33 - Nuweibi, 34 - Abu Dabbab, 35 - Umm-Nuggat 36 - Ascension-Border, 37 - E Assier, 38 - Limu, 39 - Alakha, 40 - Jabal-Hamra, 41 - Guraya, 42 - Khalzan-Buregtey, 43 - Ulug-Tanzek, 44 - Snezhnoe, 45 - Zashikhinskoe, 46 - Kanyika, 47 - Lovozerskoe, 48 - Mabuni, 49 - Beloziminskoe, 50 - Srednesiminskoe, 51 - Tukhta-Vara, 52 - Upper-Fir, 53 - Zhenli, 54 - Zavitinskoe, 55 - Parun, 56 - Tagavlor, 57 - Xianhualin, 58 - Datszishan, 59 - Ichun, 60 - Oryol, 61 - Etykinskoe, 62 - Baihuanao, 63 - Kugarok, 64 - Tungi, 65 - Baerzhe. 5. DIN EN 16601-00-01:2015-05, Raumfahrttechnik_- Glossar; Englische Fassung EN_16601-00-01:2015
|
|