Classification of Living Kidney Donation Experiences on Reddit: Understanding the Sensitivity of ChatGPT to Prompt Engineering (Preprint)

Author:

Nielsen JoshuaORCID,Chen Xiaoyu,Davis LaShara,Waterman Amy,Gentili Monica

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Living kidney donation (LKD), where individuals donate one kidney while alive, plays a critical role in increasing the number of kidneys available for those suffering from kidney failure. Prior studies show that many generous people are interested in becoming living donors, but a huge gap exists between the number of patients on the waiting list and the number of living donors yearly.

OBJECTIVE

To bridge this gap, we investigated how to identify potential living donors from discussion on public social media forums so that educational interventions could later be directed to them.

METHODS

Utilizing Reddit forums as an example, this study describes the classification of Reddit content shared about LKD into three classes: (1) Present (presently dealing with LKD personally), (2) Past (dealt with LKD personally in the past), and Other (LKD general comments). An evaluation comparing a fine-tuned DistilBERT model (hereafter written BERT for simplicity) and inference with GPT-3.5 (ChatGPT) occurred. To systematically evaluate ChatGPT’s sensitivity to distinguishing between the three prompt categories, we employed a comprehensive prompt engineering strategy encompassing a full factorial analysis in 48 runs. A novel prompt engineering approach, Dialogue Until Classification Consensus (DUCC), was introduced to simulate a deliberation between two domain experts until a consensus on classification was achieved.

RESULTS

BERT and GPT-3.5 exhibited classification accuracies of approximately 75% and 78%, respectively. Recognizing the inherent ambiguity between classes, a post-hoc analysis of incorrect predictions was performed, revealing sensible reasoning and acceptable errors from the predictive models. Considering these acceptable mis-matched predictions, the accuracy improved to 89.33% for BERT, 90.67% for GPT-3.5, and 92.67% for GPT-4.

CONCLUSIONS

Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5 are highly capable of detecting and categorizing LKD targeted content on social media forums. They are sensitive to instructions, and the introduced DUCC method exhibited superior performance over standalone reasoning, highlighting the merit in advancing prompt engineering methodologies. The models can produce appropriate contextual reasoning, even when final conclusions differ from human counterparts.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3