A Cross-Study Analysis of Mobile EMA in Monitoring Behavior and Well-Being: Insights to Refine EMA Methods (Preprint)

Author:

Cook DianeORCID,Walker Aiden,Minor Bryan,Luna Catherine,Tomaszewski Farias Sarah,Wiese Lisa,Weaver Raven,Schmitter-Edgecombe Maureen

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers an effective method to collect frequent, real-time data on an individual’s well-being. However, challenges exist in response consistency, completeness, and accuracy.

OBJECTIVE

This goal of this study is to analyze EMA responses across various settings, using data from multiple diverse studies to enhance the generalizability of conclusions. We analyze the influence of contextual factors on participant engagement with EMA prompts and inform improvements in EMA methodology.

METHODS

Data from 521 participants in nine clinical studies were analyzed using statistical and machine learning techniques. Data were collected with an in-house app on smartwatches or tablets for daily EMA responses. The analysis focused on response rate, completeness, quality, and alignment with sensor-observed behavior.

RESULTS

The average response rate (RR) was 79.04%. Participants were most responsive in the evening (75.41%) and on weekdays (70.22%), though results varied based on study demographics. RR correlation with the number of EMA questions at each session was r=-.335 (P<.001). RR correlations were also observed with sensor-detected activity level (r=.045, P<.001), being at home (r=.174, P<.001), and nearness to change points (r=.124, P<.001). In terms of response quality, the percentage of careless responses increased by .022 throughout the study (P<.001) and variance decreased by .363 (P<.001). For all analyses, differences in results were observed between the individual studies.

CONCLUSIONS

EMA response patterns are significantly influenced by participant demographics and study parameters. Tailoring EMA prompt strategies to specific participant characteristics can improve response rates and quality. Additionally, incorporating sensor-based behavior context enhances the effectiveness of EMA studies.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3