Distinguishing Patient Interests between Non-therapeutic vs. Therapeutic Use of Methylphenidate as a Study Aid: A Topic Modelling of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Social Media Community (Preprint)

Author:

Kim MaryanneORCID,Shin SeungyeonORCID,Hong Song HeeORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methylphenidate (MPH) is commonly used off-label as a study aid, raising concerns about its non-therapeutic use and associated risks. While use of MPH as a study aid is discouraged, students with academic difficulties would therapeutically need MPH for enhancing their executive function. Understanding user topic patterns related to therapeutic and non-therapeutic use of MPH can provide insights into factors influencing usage patterns and guide interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate user topic patterns associated with therapeutic and non-therapeutic use of MPH as study aids, utilizing social media posts.

METHODS

We utilized Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling to identify underlying themes from user-generated posts on an Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) social media platform. The posts pertaining to MPH use for academic purposes (N=1,447) were classified into therapeutic and non-therapeutic use and the distribution of posting season and topic prevalence were assessed between two usage patterns. Logistic regression and interaction analyses were conducted to examine associations between topics and MPH usage, accounting for seasonal variations.

RESULTS

The result of LDA topic modeling revealed six key topics: effect alteration, atomoxetine therapy, ADHD challenges, diagnosis and consultation, brain stimulation, and academic performance. While effect alteration (OR=6.31, P=.017) and brain stimulation (OR=6.63, P=.042), were significantly associated with non-therapeutic use, atomoxetine therapy (OR=0.04, P<.001) and ADHD challenges (OR=0.16, P=.013) were linked to therapeutic use. Interaction analyses revealed synergistic and antagonistic effects between topic pairs, modulating their impacts on usage patterns. Pro-therapeutic topics such as atomoxetine therapy and ADHD challenges exhibited a shift towards non-therapeutic use during non-winter seasons.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide insights into the complex interplay of user topics associated with therapeutic and non-therapeutic use of MPH for academic purposes. Understanding these patterns can inform targeted interventions aimed at promoting safe and appropriate MPH use among students, particularly during seasons when misuse risks may increase among those experiencing ADHD challenges.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3