Towards a Domain-Overarching Metadata Schema for Making Health Research Studies FAIR: The NFDI4Health Metadata Schema (Preprint)

Author:

Abaza HaithamORCID,Shutsko AliaksandraORCID,Klopfenstein Sophie A. I.ORCID,Vorisek Carina N.ORCID,Golebiewski MartinORCID,Schmidt Carsten OliverORCID,Brünings-Kuppe ClaudiaORCID,Clemens VeraORCID,Darms JohannesORCID,Hanß SabineORCID,Intemann TimmORCID,Jannasch FranziskaORCID,Kasbohm ElisaORCID,Lindstädt BirteORCID,Löbe MatthiasORCID,Nimptsch KatharinaORCID,Nöthlings UteORCID,Ocanto Marisabel GonzalezORCID,Osei Tracy BonsuORCID,Perrar InesORCID,Peters ManuelaORCID,Pischon TobiasORCID,Sax UlrichORCID,Schulze Matthias B.ORCID,Schwarz FlorianORCID,Schwedhelm CarolinaORCID,Thun SylviaORCID,Waltemath DagmarORCID,Wünsche HannesORCID,Zeleke Atinkut A.ORCID,Müller WolfgangORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite wide acceptance in medical research, implementation of the FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) is lacking in certain health domains and interoperability across data sources remains a challenge. While clinical trial registries collect metadata about clinical studies, numerous epidemiological and public health studies examining chronic disease burden remain unregistered or missing detailed information about relevant study documents. Making valuable data from these studies available to the research community could potentially improve our understanding of these diseases and their risk factors. The National Research Data Infrastructure for Personal Health Data (NFDI4Health) seeks to optimize data sharing among the clinical, epidemiological, and public health research communities, while preserving privacy and ethical regulations. To this end, a metadata schema (MDS) is developed to support the standardized publication of health studies’ metadata on the German Central Health Study Hub (GCHSH), thus making them searchable and findable.

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes the development, structure, and implementation of a metadata schema designed to improve the FAIRness of data from clinical, epidemiological, and public health research, while maintaining compatibility with existing data models to ease interoperability.

METHODS

Based on DataCite, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other international standards and models, the first MDS version was developed by the NFDI4Health Task Force COVID-19. It was later extended in a modular fashion, combining generic and use case-specific metadata items relevant to the nutritional epidemiology, chronic diseases, and record linkage domains, the first three use cases covered by NFDI4Health. Mappings to schemas of clinical trial registries and international initiatives were performed to enable interfacing with external resources. The schema is represented in Excel spreadsheets. Yet, a transformation into the ART-DECOR tool was completed towards an improved machine-readable version.

RESULTS

The MDS comprises over 200 metadata items in five modules. Generic metadata, such as bibliographic and design and data access information, are covered by the core and design modules. Domain-specific metadata are included in use case modules, currently dedicated to nutritional epidemiology, chronic diseases, and record linkage. All modules incorporate mandatory, optional, and conditional items. Mappings to clinical trial registries are used by the GCHSH to automatically upload and display study metadata from their portals. Mappings to other schemas are still in progress, yet several commonalities were identified in the first iterations. Information in the Excel version was fully represented in ART-DECOR.

CONCLUSIONS

With its implementation in the GCHSH, the schema promises to improve the FAIRness of data from clinical, epidemiological, and public health research. Due to its generic nature, it is also transferable to adjacent research fields and useful for a broader user community. The mapping activities and representations enable interoperability with other systems, yet various challenges need to be resolved. Future extensions include clinical trials and imaging/radiomics dedicated modules.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3