Impact of Survey Methods on Data Quality: Perspective from a survey about the use of smart lockers in medication distribution for chronic diseases. (Preprint)

Author:

Niyang Piring'ar Mercy,Nnadozie Havilah OnyinyechiORCID,Adamu Helen,Bello Azeez,Agboola Samson,Gobir Ibrahim Bola

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The data collection method is crucial in research processes and, therefore, should be designed to achieve the aims and objectives of the research. However, different data collection methods have their benefits and limitations. It is, therefore, imperative to choose the best method of data collection that will be adaptable to the research. It is also important to ensure that the data collection method selected and the data collection tool designed take cognizance of the intended respondents’ ability to use the data collection tool. The paper-based questionnaire has been a traditional data collection method in surveys, while the web-based survey is a more recent development. This study compares the quality of data collected through paper-based survey with the quality of data obtained by web-based survey.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the quality of data collected through paper-based questionnaires with web-based questionnaires in research that examines the acceptance of smart lockers in medication distribution for chronic diseases.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional research design, we collected data from healthcare workers providing chronic care and patients with chronic disease through web-based and paper-based methods. We asked participants about the perceived benefits of using smart lockers to dispense chronic care medication.

RESULTS

The web-based data collection method was found to have minimal errors compared to the paper-based data collection tool. However, the paper-based data collection tool generated more responses and had less delay in responses.

CONCLUSIONS

The advent of internet-enabled mobile phones and other devices has garnered wide acceptance for web-based surveys. However, the reality posed by the absence of technological advancement in remote areas and unreliable internet connectivity in many regions were found to be reason for individuals in those locations to prefer responding to paper-based questionnaires. Thus, there is still a preference for paper-based surveys among the majority of respondents.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3