Pharmacists’ Trust in Automated Pill Recognition Technology: The Role of Presenting AI Uncertainty Information (Preprint)

Author:

Kim Jin YongORCID,Marshall Vincent D.,Rowell Brigid,Chen Qiyuan,Zheng YifanORCID,Lee John D.,Kontar Raed AlORCID,Lester Corey,Yang X. JessieORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dispensing errors significantly contribute to adverse drug events, resulting in substantial healthcare costs and patient harm. Automated pill verification technologies have been developed to aid pharmacists with medication dispensing. However, pharmacists’ trust in such automated technologies remains unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate pharmacists’ trust in automated pill verification technology designed to support medication dispensing.

METHODS

Thirty participants performed a simulated pill verification task with the help of an imperfect AI aid recommending acceptance or rejection of a filled medication. The experiment employed a mixed-subjects design. The between-subjects factor was the AI aid type, with or without an AI uncertainty plot. The within-subjects factor was the four potential verification outcomes: AI rejects the incorrect drug, AI rejects the correct drug, AI approves the incorrect drug, and AI approves the correct drug.

RESULTS

Participants had an average trust propensity score of 72 out of 100 (SD = 18.08), indicating a positive attitude towards trusting automated technologies. The introduction of an uncertainty plot to the AI aid significantly enhanced pharmacists’ end trust (t(28) = -1.854, p = .037). Trust dynamics were influenced by AI aid type and verification outcome. Specifically, pharmacists using the AI aid with the uncertainty plot had a significantly larger trust increment when AI approved the correct drug (t(78.98) = 3.93, p < .001) and a significantly larger trust decrement when AI approved the incorrect drug (t(2939.72) = -4.78, p < .001). Intriguingly, the absence of the uncertainty plot led to an increase in trust when AI correctly rejected an incorrect drug, whereas the presence of the plot resulted in a decrease in trust under the same circumstances (t(509.77) = -3.96, p < .001). A pronounced “negativity bias” was observed, where the degree of trust reduction when AI made an error exceeded the trust gain when AI made a correct decision (z = -11.30, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first attempt to examine pharmacists’ trust in automated pill verification technology. Our findings reveal that pharmacists have a favorable disposition toward trusting automation. Moreover, providing uncertainty information about the AI’s recommendation significantly boosts pharmacists’ trust in the AI aid, highlighting the importance of developing transparent AI systems within healthcare.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3