An interface between ehealth, health literacy and health-related behavior: Qualitative interview study on laypersons experiences with a mobile symptom checker app (Preprint)

Author:

Koch RolandORCID,Steffen Marie-TheresORCID,Wetzel Anna-JasminORCID,Preiser ChristineORCID,Klemmt MalteORCID,Ehni Hans-JörgORCID,Mueller ReginaORCID,Joos StefanieORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptom checkers are designed to support their users in recognizing medical symptoms and recommending courses of action. The applications are not yet reliable for self-triage and diagnostics. Users (e-)health literacy plays a role in how symptom checkers are used, but it is unclear how the process from symptom via application input to consulting health care works.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe symptom checker use from the perspective of laypersons. Three research questions are addressed: 1) How do users describe the process of using symptom checkers? 2) What are entry points and possible outcomes of symptom checker app use? 3) How are health literacy and e-health literacy expressed during the use of SCA?

METHODS

As part of the CHECK.APP project, 15 medical laypersons were interviewed about their experiences with a specific symptom checker using an interview guideline. The transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using the integrative basic procedure. It combined an analysis of social positioning and agency with Achtziger and Gollwitzer's Rubicon model as concrete heuristics.

RESULTS

App use corresponds to a cyclic process. Its initiation depends on biographical, social and contextual factors. Users employed symptom checkers for three purposes: Information gathering, action recommendation and communication. They integrate various social, personal and digital resources in their health-related behavior. Their evaluation of the use process depends on context factors, app output and the result of their health-related behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Health literacy and e-health literacy are expressed at each step of the process, showing that symptom checkers rely heavily on users’ health literacy. To be more effective, symptom checkers should be more transparently integrated in health care.

CLINICALTRIAL

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00022465

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-10.2196/34026

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3