Responsible artificial intelligence in clinical decision support systems requires good science: Lessons learned from an international roundtable discussion (Preprint)

Author:

Pfisterer KaylenORCID,Saha ShumitORCID,Fossat YanORCID,Grossman Maura RORCID,Wong AlexanderORCID,Yadollahi AzadehORCID,Wang BoORCID,Garg AnimeshORCID,Dinu Larisa,Kale DimitraORCID,Leppin CorinnaORCID,Oldham MelissaORCID,Taylor MadisonORCID,Connell IanORCID,Garnett ClaireORCID,Pham QuynhORCID

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

In healthcare, where increasing efficiency is essential to the demand of scale, there is immense opportunity to incorporate advances in artificial intelligence (AI). However, particularly in healthcare, these technologies must be designed to be both effective and ethical. Our objective in a multidisciplinary international roundtable discussion (Canada, United States, United Kingdom), was to identify concepts, perspectives, and considerations for AI systems in healthcare settings that are designed, developed, and deployed with good intention to empower patients and healthcare providers in a safe, trustworthy, and ethical way. We refer to this notion as responsible AI (RAI). First, we discuss the role and opportunity of AI to support collaborative healthcare (clinicians and patients working together) and increase specialist capacity. Second, we outline risks and ramifications of poorly implemented AI including bias, implications of predictors to support diagnosis, and privacy and security considerations. Third, we discuss how these risks can be mitigated through conducting “good science” by addressing biases such as representative data, probing annotation bias, and the role of the biostatistician. We also outline the need to evaluate fit for purpose through transdisciplinary collaboration to address: explainability, fairness, interpretability, transparency, as well as the role of standards, auditing, and regulatory considerations. Finally, we detail four criteria outlining determinants, considerations and rationale for developing RAI. These determinants and considerations are meant to position new AI-powered healthcare technologies primed for responsible design supporting acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and adoption. Future directions should expand on additional factors and monitor responsible AI implementation success to validate these criteria.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3