Variation in experiences and attainment in surgery between ethnicities of UK medical students and doctors (ATTAIN) A cross sectional study protocol (Preprint)

Author:

Georgi MariaORCID,Babiker SamarORCID,Ogunmwonyi Innocent,Tan LawrenceORCID,Haque SharmiORCID,Mullins WilliamORCID,Singh PriscaORCID,Ang Nadya,Fu HowellORCID,Patel KrunalORCID,Khera Jevan,Fricker MontyORCID,Fleming SimonORCID,Giwa-Brown Lolade,A Brennan Peter,Irune Ekpemi,Vig Stella,Nathan ArjunORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A diverse healthcare system is required to meet the needs of an increasingly cosmopolitan patient population. One barrier to this is the differential attainment in educational outcomes between Black and Minority Ethnicity (BME) and white medical students and doctors in the U.K. Several factors have been identified, however there has been limited evidence to date looking specifically at surgical training experiences and its relationship to differential attainment.

OBJECTIVE

The “vAriation in experiences and aTTainment In surgery between ethNicities of UK medical students and doctors” (ATTAIN) study aims to describe and compare the factors and outcomes of attainment between different ethnicities of doctors and medical students.

METHODS

This protocol describes a nationwide cross-sectional study of medical students and non-consultant grade doctors. Participants will complete an online questionnaire that will collect data on experiences and perceptions of surgical placements as well and self-reported academic attainment data. A comprehensive data collection strategy will be employed to collect a representative sample of the population.

RESULTS

The primary aim will be to determine any potential differences in the experiences and perceptions of medical students and junior doctors in surgery and its link to surgical attainment. A set of surrogate markers relevant to surgical training will be used to establish a primary outcome to determine variation in attainment. Regression analyses will be used to identify potential causes for the variation in attainment.

CONCLUSIONS

Drawing upon the conclusions of this study we aim to make recommendations on educational policy reforms. Additionally, the creation of a large, comprehensive dataset can be used for further research.

CLINICALTRIAL

The protocol was approved by the University College London Research Ethics Committee on 16/09/2021 (Ethics approval reference 19071/004).

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3