Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review

Author:

van Kessel RobinORCID,Roman-Urrestarazu AndresORCID,Anderson MichaelORCID,Kyriopoulos IliasORCID,Field SamanthaORCID,Monti GiovanniORCID,Reed Shelby DORCID,Pavlova MilenaORCID,Wharton GeorgeORCID,Mossialos EliasORCID

Abstract

Background Digital therapeutics are patient-facing digital health interventions that can significantly alter the health care landscape. Despite digital therapeutics being used to successfully treat a range of conditions, their uptake in health systems remains limited. Understanding the full spectrum of uptake factors is essential to identify ways in which policy makers and providers can facilitate the adoption of effective digital therapeutics within a health system, as well as the steps developers can take to assist in the deployment of products. Objective In this review, we aimed to map the most frequently discussed factors that determine the integration of digital therapeutics into health systems and practical use of digital therapeutics by patients and professionals. Methods A scoping review was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar. Relevant data were extracted and synthesized using a thematic analysis. Results We identified 35,541 academic and 221 gray literature reports, with 244 (0.69%) included in the review, covering 35 countries. Overall, 85 factors that can impact the uptake of digital therapeutics were extracted and pooled into 5 categories: policy and system, patient characteristics, properties of digital therapeutics, characteristics of health professionals, and outcomes. The need for a regulatory framework for digital therapeutics was the most stated factor at the policy level. Demographic characteristics formed the most iterated patient-related factor, whereas digital literacy was considered the most important factor for health professionals. Among the properties of digital therapeutics, their interoperability across the broader health system was most emphasized. Finally, the ability to expand access to health care was the most frequently stated outcome measure. Conclusions The map of factors developed in this review offers a multistakeholder approach to recognizing the uptake factors of digital therapeutics in the health care pathway and provides an analytical tool for policy makers to assess their health system’s readiness for digital therapeutics.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference281 articles.

1. FahyNWilliamsGAHabichtTKöhlerKJormanainenVSatokangasMTynkkynenLKLantzschHWinklemannJCasciniFde BelvisAGMorsellaAPosciaARicciardiWSilenziAFarcasanuDScinteeSGVladescuCDelgadoEBPueyoEARomeroFEUse of Digital Health Tools in Europe: Before, During and After COVID-1920212022-11-01Copenhagen (Denmark)European Observatory on Health Systems and Policieshttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576970/

2. Characteristics and challenges of the clinical pipeline of digital therapeutics

3. What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients?

4. Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries’ approaches

5. BrasselSRaduPBellEGarauMNavigating the landscape of digital healthOffice of Health Economics20222023-01-11https://www.ohe.org/publications/navigating-the-landscape-of-digital-health/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3