Assessing the Quality and Behavior Change Potential of Vaping Cessation Apps: Systematic Search and Assessment

Author:

McKay FionaORCID,Chan LilianORCID,Cerio RebeccaORCID,Rickards SandraORCID,Hastings PhillipaORCID,Reakes KateORCID,O'Brien TraceyORCID,Dunn MatthewORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background An increasing number of people are using vapes (e-cigarettes), and with growing evidence of associated harms, there is a need for acceptable cessation support and interventions. Smartphone apps for health and well-being have increased in popularity and use. Limited published literature assesses the potential of apps to support vaping cessation. Objective A systematic search of vaping cessation apps currently available in Australia for iOS and Android platforms was conducted. Apps were assessed against established health app assessment tools for quality and behavior change potential. Methods A systematic search through the Australian Apple iTunes and Google Play stores was conducted using the search terms “vape”; “vaping”; “e-cigarette”; and “cessation,” “quit,” or “quitting” in May 2023. Only apps that encouraged the cessation of vaping were included. App descriptions were reviewed to determine if they were relevant for inclusion in this study, and relevant apps were downloaded onto the appropriate mobile device for review. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to rate the quality (engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information) of the apps using an overall score out of 5. The App Behavior Change Scale (ABACUS) was used to assess the behavior change potential of each app using a score out of 21. Results An initial search of the app stores yielded 220 Android apps and 124 iOS apps. Screening against the inclusion criteria left 20 iOS apps and 10 Android apps for review. Six apps were available on both operating systems, and these were downloaded, reviewed, and reported separately for each operating system. The average MARS score for all apps assessed in this review was 3.1 (SD 0.41) out of 5. The reviewed apps overall performed well for the MARS elements relating to functionality, such as ease of use and navigation, but had the lowest scores for information-related elements, such as credibility. The number of ABACUS behavior change features per app ranged from 0 to 19 out of 21, with a mean of 8.9 (SD 4.51). The apps commonly included information-related features, such as requesting baseline information. The least common behavior change features were those relating to goal-setting, such as asking about the user’s willingness for behavior change and providing feedback on current actions in comparison to future goals. Conclusions The identified vaping cessation apps had moderate levels of quality and some behavior change components. Future vaping cessation apps could benefit from including more features that are known to support behavior change, such as goal-setting, to improve the potential benefit of these apps to support people to stop vaping. As guidelines for vaping cessation continue to be established, future apps need to reference these in their development.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Reference42 articles.

1. Changes in prevalence of vaping among youths in the United States, Canada, and England from 2017 to 2019;Hammond;JAMA Pediatr

2. Trends in adolescent vaping, 2017-2019;Miech;N Engl J Med

3. Electronic cigarettes and health outcomes: umbrella and systematic review of the global evidence;Banks;Med J Aust

4. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and MedicineHealth and Medicine DivisionBoard on Population Health and Public Health PracticeCommittee on the Review of the Health Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. Eaton DL Kwan LY Stratton K , editors. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Academies Press (US); 2018. [Medline: 29894118]

5. Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks. Opinion on electronic cigarettes. European Commission: Public Health. Apr16, 2021. URL: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-08/scheer_o_017.pdf [Accessed 26-10-2023]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3