Causes of Patient Nonattendance at Medical Appointments: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Author:

Schwalbe DariaORCID,Sodemann MortenORCID,Iachina MariaORCID,Nørgård Bente MertzORCID,Chodkiewicz Nina HøyORCID,Ammentorp JetteORCID

Abstract

Background Approximately one-third of patient appointments in Danish health care result in failures, leading to patient risk and sizable resource waste. Existing interventions to alleviate no-shows often target the patients. The underlying reason behind these interventions is a view that attendance or nonattendance is solely the patient’s problem. However, these interventions often prove to be ineffective and can perpetuate social biases and health inequalities, leaving behind patients who are more vulnerable or disadvantaged (in terms of social, economical, and linguistic factors, etc). A more holistic understanding of no-shows is needed to optimize processes, reduce waste, and support patients who are vulnerable. Objective This study aims to gain a deep and more comprehensive understanding of the causes, mechanisms, and recurring patterns and elements contributing to nonattendance at Danish hospitals in the Region of Southern Denmark. It emphasizes the patient perspective and analyzes the relational and organizational processes surrounding no-shows in health care. In addition, the study aims to identify effective communicative strategies and organizational processes that can support the development and implementation of successful interventions. Methods The study uses mixed quantitative-qualitative methods, encompassing 4 analytical projects focusing on nonattendance patterns, patient knowledge and behavior, the management of hospital appointments, and in situ communication. To address the complexity of no-shows in health care, the study incorporates various data sources. The quantitative data sources include the electronic patient records, Danish central registries, Danish National Patient Registry, and Register of Medicinal Product Statistics. Baseline characteristics of patients at different levels are compared using chi-square tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The qualitative studies involve observational data, individual semistructured interviews with patients and practitioners, and video recordings of patient consultations. Results This paper presents the protocol of the study, which was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation in July 2022. Recruitment started in February 2023. It is anticipated that the quantitative data analysis will be completed by the end of September 2023, with the qualitative investigation starting in October 2023. The first study findings are anticipated to be available by the end of 2024. Conclusions The existing studies of nonattendance in Danish health care are inadequate in addressing relational and organizational factors leading to hospital no-shows. Interventions have had limited effect, highlighting the Danish health care system’s failure to accommodate patients who are vulnerable. Effective interventions require a qualitative approach and robust ethnographic data to supplement the description and categorization of no-shows at hospitals. Obtaining comprehensive knowledge about the causes of missed patient appointments will yield practical benefits, enhancing the safety, coherence, and quality of treatment in health care. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/46227

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

General Medicine

Reference90 articles.

1. PedersonFSNielsenMPatienter udebliver fra 50.000 aftaler på bare ét hospitalBerlingske20151052022-03-15https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/patienter-udebliver-fra-50.000-aftaler-paa-bare-et-hospital

2. WrightRLMissed appointment / no show policyHealth Care Institute of North Florida2023-06-20http://healthcareinstitute.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/MissedAppointmentsPolicy1.pdf

3. KiilMHUdeblivelser i psykiatrienPsykiatri og Social201511122023-06-20https://www.rm.dk/api/NewESDHBlock/DownloadFile?agendaPath=%5C%5CRMAPPS0221.onerm.dk%5Ccms01-ext%5CESDH%20Data%5CRM_​Internet%5CDagsordener%5CUdvalg_vedroerende_ps%202015%5C02-12-2015%5CAaben_dagsorden&appendixId=122084

4. KielstrupL12.424 patienter brød deres aftale på sygehuset: det duer simpelthen ikkeTV SYD20188272022-03-15https://www.tvsyd.dk/region-syddanmark/12424-patienter-brod-deres-aftale-pa-sygehuset-det-duer-simpelthen-ikke

5. PedersenFSHver femte patient udebliver fra aftaler på hospitaler i hovedstaden: »det er mangel på respekt og ordentlighed«Berlingske20217232023-06-19https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/hver-femte-patient-udebliver-fra-aftaler-paa-hospitaler-i-​hovedstaden-det

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3