Predicting Hypoxia Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review

Author:

Pigat LenaORCID,Geisler Benjamin PORCID,Sheikhalishahi SeyedmostafaORCID,Sander JuliaORCID,Kaspar MathiasORCID,Schmutz MaximilianORCID,Rohr Sven OlafORCID,Wild Carl MathisORCID,Goss SebastianORCID,Zaghdoudi SarraORCID,Hinske Ludwig ChristianORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Hypoxia is an important risk factor and indicator for the declining health of inpatients. Predicting future hypoxic events using machine learning is a prospective area of study to facilitate time-critical interventions to counter patient health deterioration. Objective This systematic review aims to summarize and compare previous efforts to predict hypoxic events in the hospital setting using machine learning with respect to their methodology, predictive performance, and assessed population. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using Web of Science, Ovid with Embase and MEDLINE, and Google Scholar. Studies that investigated hypoxia or hypoxemia of hospitalized patients using machine learning models were considered. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Results After screening, a total of 12 papers were eligible for analysis, from which 32 models were extracted. The included studies showed a variety of population, methodology, and outcome definition. Comparability was further limited due to unclear or high risk of bias for most studies (10/12, 83%). The overall predictive performance ranged from moderate to high. Based on classification metrics, deep learning models performed similar to or outperformed conventional machine learning models within the same studies. Models using only prior peripheral oxygen saturation as a clinical variable showed better performance than models based on multiple variables, with most of these studies (2/3, 67%) using a long short-term memory algorithm. Conclusions Machine learning models provide the potential to accurately predict the occurrence of hypoxic events based on retrospective data. The heterogeneity of the studies and limited generalizability of their results highlight the need for further validation studies to assess their predictive performance.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Reference36 articles.

1. Bhutta BS Alghoula F Berim I . Hypoxia. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [Medline: 29493941]

2. Regulation of tissue oxygenation;Pittman;Colloquium Series on Integrated Systems Physiology

3. Sood S Manaker S Finlay G . Evaluation and management of the nonventilated, hospitalized adult patient with acute hypoxemia. UpToDate. Sep8, 2022. URL: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/evaluation-and-management-of-the-nonventilated-hospitalized-adult-patient-with-acute-hypoxemia [Accessed 22-02-2023]

4. Aronson LA . Hypoxemia. In: Atlee JL , editor. Complications in Anesthesia. 2nd ed. Saunders; 2007;637-640.

5. Hypoxemia in the ICU: prevalence, treatment, and outcome;SRLF Trial Group;Ann Intensive Care

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Artificial intelligence and nonoperating room anesthesia;Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology;2024-05-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3