Author:
Potrzeszcz-Sut Beata, ,Dudzik Agnieszka,
Abstract
The work attempts to choose the handy methods for analyzing structural reliability. Comparative analysis of the methods was performed on an example of dome truss susceptible to stability loss from the condition of node snapping. In the reliability analysis of structure the load magnitudes (P), the axial stiffness of bars (EA), coordinate nodes (Z) are represented by random variables. The criterion of structural failure is expressed by the condition of non-exceeding the admissible load multiplier. The Hasofer-Lind reliability index was determined. In analysis were used three approaches differing way of defining the limit state function: Approach 1 – using of implicit limit state function, Approach 2 – using of explicit neural state functions, Approach 3 – using of the Hybrid Monte Carlo method.
Publisher
Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Engineering and Sciences Publication - BEIESP
Subject
Computer Science Applications,General Engineering,Environmental Engineering
Reference28 articles.
1. H. O. Madsen and N. C. Krenk, Methods of Structural Safety. Englewood Cliffs, USA: Prentice Hall, 1986.
2. R. E. Melchers, Structural Reliability Analysis and Predictions, 2nd wyd. J. Wiley & Sons, 1996.
3. O. Ditlevsen and H. Madsen, Structural Reliability Methods. Chichester, UK,: J. Wiley & Sons, 1996.
4. P. Thoft-Christensen and M. J. Baker, Structural Reliability. Theory and its Applications. Springer-Verlag, 1982.
5. G. Augusti, A. Baratta, and F. Casciati, Probabilistic Methods in Structural Engineering. Chapman and Hall, 1984.