A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ONDANSETRON WITH RAMOSETRON IN PREVENTION OF POST-OPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Author:

Ramakrishna Bandaru ,Pramila T ,Prathibha T ,BV Surendra

Abstract

Objective: Post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is an unpleasant, distressing, and exhausting experience for patients. PONV may prolong recovery, delay patient discharge, and increase hospital costs. Prevention and treatment of PONV help to accelerate post-operative recovery and increase patient satisfaction. In this study, we compared the efficacy of Ondansetron and Ramosetron to prevent PONV in patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia and also to study their side effects. Methods: Eighty patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] I and II) between the age group of 18 and 65 years scheduled to undergo elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. Group O received Ondansetron 4 mg and Group R received Ramosetron 0.3 mg intravenously before induction of anaesthesia. Episodes of nausea, vomiting, and retching were determined and noted in first 24 h after surgery at time intervals of 0–3 h, 3–6 h, 6–12 h, and 12–24 h. The incidence of adverse effects and the use of rescue anti-emetics were also noted in the post-operative period. At the end of the surgery, results were compiled and statistical analysis was done using Student’s “t” test and Chi-square test. p<0.05 was considered as significant. Results: The incidence of nausea was lower in patients receiving Ramosetron when compared to patients receiving Ondansetron especially in the 0–3 h period (p=0.032). This was statistically significant. The incidence nausea was lower in Group R during 3–6 h, 6–12 h, and 12–24 h period which was not statistically significant (p=1.000, p=0.359, p=1.000 respectively). The incidence of vomiting was lower in patients receiving Ramosetron when compared to patients receiving Ondansetron in the 0–3 h, 3–6 h, 6–12 h, and 12–24 h period, but it was not statistically significant (p=0.712, p=1.000, p=0.241, and p=0.116, respectively). The use of rescue anti-emetics and the incidence of adverse side effects were more in patients receiving Ondansetron when compared to patients receiving Ramosetron with no significance. Conclusion: Our study concludes that ramosetron was more effective than ondansetron in the prevention of post-operative nausea and was associated with fewer side effects comparatively.

Publisher

Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3