LATERAL APPROACH OF POPLITEAL BLOCK VERSUS UNILATERAL SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR BELOW KNEE SURGERIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Author:

Pujari Mayura D,Kakade Pooja D,Benare Aparna G

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: The aims of the study were to compare efficacy and side effects of popliteal block and unilateral spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing below knee surgeries. Methods: This was a comparative study comprising patients undergoing below knee surgeries. Sixty patients were divided into two groups depending on whether surgery was done under unilateral spinal anesthesia (Group SA) or popliteal block (Group PB). The parameters compared between the studied groups included hemodynamic changes, onset of motor block, onset and duration of analgesia, duration of motor block, onset of pain, and amount of rescue analgesia required. Side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia, and urinary retention were compared between the two groups. SSPS 22.0 was used for statistical analysis and p<0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results: There were 14 (46.67%) males and 16 (53.33%) females, whereas, in Group PB, there were 13 (43.33%) males and 17 (56.67%) females. Mean age of patients in Group SA was found to be 42.93±16.79 and 39.57±14.05 in Group PB. The mean age and gender distribution and ASA grades of patients in both the groups were found to be comparable with no statistically significant difference. The mean duration of sensory as well as motor block was found to be significantly less in Group SA as compared to Group PB and the difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.001). Group PB showed a better hemodynamic as well as analgesic profile as compared to Group SA. The analgesic requirement in first 24 h was more in Group SA as compared to Group PB and the difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.001). Adverse effects in both the groups were comparable (p>0.05). Conclusion: Popliteal block provides better analgesia and hemodynamic stability as compared to unilateral spinal anesthesia and, hence, can be considered preferred mode of anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries.v

Publisher

Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3