COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TENSION BAND WIRING, MODIFIED TENSION BAND WIRING AND FULLY THREADED CANNULATED CANCELLOUS SCREWS FOR FIXATION OF MEDIAL MALLEOLUS FRACTURES

Author:

SANTOSH S BORKAR ,SHIVRAJ S KONDE ,RAJIV MUNDE ,SHANTANU PATIL ,SHUBHAM CHAUDHARI ,MANAS PUSALKAR

Abstract

Objective: To compare the three most commonly used fixation techniques: “Tension band wiring, modified tension band wiring, and fully threaded cannulated cancellous screws for fixation of medial malleolus fractures.” Methods: A prospective comparative cohort study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital in rural Maharashtra. Patients were allocated into three groups, with 33 patients in each group. The internal fixation was done by tension band wiring, modified tension band wiring, or fully threaded cannulated cancellous screws, depending on the group to which a patient belonged. Patients were assessed using the Baird and Jackson scoring system at each follow-up at immediate post-operative period, at 3, 6, 12, 24 weeks, and 1 year. For statistical purposes, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no significant difference in the three groups as regards age, body mass index, and mean time from injury to management. The most common mode of injury was road traffic accidents (51.52%), followed by falls from height (27.27%) and sports-related injuries (21.21%). The mean duration of surgery was significantly longer in cases managed by tension band wiring as compared to the other two groups. Implant-related complications were significantly less in the threaded cannulated cancellous screw group as compared to the other two groups. Overall excellent to good outcomes were observed in 97% of cases of cannulated cancellous screws as well as in modified tension band wiring and 84.8% of cases of tension band wiring, respectively. Conclusion: Fully threaded cannulated cancellous screws or modified tension band wiring should be used for the management of medial malleolar fractures while considering the functional outcome and complications associated with each and patient-related factors.

Publisher

Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3