Abstract
In the ‘Introduction,’ Amy Koerber lays the groundwork for understanding the complexities of the academic publishing landscape. Likening the scholarly knowledge production process to reality television, this chapter gives a glimpse at the elaborate tangle of players and scenarios academic authors need to navigate in order to publish their research. This chapter introduces the term “predatory publishing” and gives a brief overview of how the term entered the academic publishing scene, along with other relevant sources that explore the topic. The complex case of the publisher, MDPI, is shared to show how new publishers are disrupting the traditional academic publishing models and creating an environment where authors need to use a range of tools and techniques to ensure their work will be published and archived properly. This chapter also explains other potential pitfalls (e.g., fake peer review) that authors must be aware of, before presenting an argument that inclusivity and diversity must be included in discussions about equitable knowledge production distribution in the global flow of academic research. The chapter concludes with an overview of the rest of the chapters in the volume.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Reference47 articles.
1. Anderson, Rick. 2018. Scholarly Communication: What Everyone Needs to Know® (New York: Oxford University Press). https://doi.org/10.1093/wentk/9780190639440.001.0001
2. ——. 2019. Issue Brief 3: Deceptive Publishing, https://doi.org/10.13021/osi2019.2419
3. ‘Annual Report’. 2020. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://res.mdpi.com/data/2020_web.pdf
4. Online-Based Approaches to Identify Real Journals and Publishers from Hijacked Ones;Asadi, Amin; Rahbar, Nader; Asadi, Meisam; Asadi, Fahime; Khalili Paji, Kokab;Science and Engineering Ethics,2016
5. STUDIES ON THE CHEMICAL NATURE OF THE SUBSTANCE INDUCING TRANSFORMATION OF PNEUMOCOCCAL TYPES;Avery, Oswald T.; MacLeod, Colin M.; McCarty, Maclyn;Journal of Experimental Medicine,1944