Abstract
While the NGO-ization paradigm helped explain the institutionalization, professionalization, and bureaucratization of feminist movements around the world, from the late 80s and early 90s on, by focusing on the most visible actors, it often concealed the multiplicity of feminisms and their internal heterogeneity. By looking at the institutionalization of feminism in Romania through decolonial lenses, this essay aims to understand some of the transnational processes that have been overlooked or curtailed within the NGO-ization literature, the mechanisms through which certain forms of feminist knowledge and practice became hegemonic and institutionalized, and some of their consequences. The essay argues that the traveling and crossings initiated by those excluded through these processes and who inhabit liminal, in-between spaces contributed to making visible multiple worlds of sense towards pluralist feminism, opening the possibility to build deep coalitions by engaging in complex communication.
Publisher
Centre for Cultural-Anthropological Studies
Reference280 articles.
1. Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2020. “Lugones's World-Making.” Critical Philosophy of Race 8 (1–2): 199–211.
2. Aldawood, Danielle. 2018. Decolonizing Human Rights Education. Arizona State University, PhD thesis.
3. Alvarez, Sonia E. 1999. “Advocating Feminism: the Latin American Feminist NGO ‘Boom’,” International Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (2): 181–209.
4. Ana, Alexandra. 2019. The NGO-ization of Social Movements in Neoliberal Times: Contemporary Feminisms in Romania and Belgium. Scuola Normale Superiore, PhD thesis.
5. Ana, Alexandra. 2020. “Hope as Master Frame in Feminist Mobilization: Between Liberal NGO-ization and Radical-Intersectional Street Politics.” Hope and Nostalgia at the Intersection between Welfare and Culture, ed. by A. Hellström, Ov. C. Norocel, and M. Bak Jørgensen, 185–202. Amsterdam: Springer.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献