Retisert: Is the New Advance in Treatment of Uveitis a Good One?

Author:

Mohammad Dina A1,Sweet Burgunda V2,Elner Susan G3

Affiliation:

1. University of Michigan Health System and College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; now, Critical Care Pharmacy Practice Resident, University of Michigan Health System and College of Pharmacy

2. Drug Information and Investigational Drug Services and Clinical Associate Professor of Pharmacy, University of Michigan Health System and College of Pharmacy

3. WK Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan Health System and School of Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To review the use of corticosteroids for the treatment of uveitis, with a focus on the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of a newer delivery device, Retisert. Data Sources: A PubMed/MEDLINE search from 1950 through February 2007 was conducted, and manufacturer-provided data were reviewed. Study Selection And Data Extraction: Animal studies and Phase II and III clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of Retisert for the treatment of uveitis were considered. The data were extracted from Pub Med/MEDLINE using the search terms fluocinolone acetonide, corticosteroids, intravitreal implant, uveitis, ocular steroids, and Retisert. Data Synthesis: The findings of the clinical studies showed, with use of Retisert, a reduction in the recurrence of uveitis, improvement in visual acuity, and a decreased need for adjunctive therapy with corticosteroids and immunosuppressant agents, There are currently no studies directly comparing Retisert with other treatment options. The most commonly reported adverse events (ADEs) in clinical trials included cataracts, increased intraocular pressure, post-procedural complications associated with implant insertion, and ocular pain. Other ocular ADEs included decreased visual acuity, glaucoma, blurred vision, an abnormal sensation in the eye, eye irritation, and a change in tearing. These ADEs are similar to those seen with chronic corticosteroid therapy delivered by other ocular routes. Conclusions: Retisert implants have been shown to deliver sufficient drug for a longer period of time compared with the traditional steroid delivery methods. Promising efficacy results show a significant reduction in recurrence rate and improvement in visual acuity for approximately 3 years after implant. However, the drug carries the risks associated with the implant procedure and with chronic exposure of the eye to steroids. Until more data on the long-term safety are known, Retisert should be reserved for patients who are no longer tolerant of or responsive to more traditional treatment modalities.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 39 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Corticosteroid implants for chronic non-infectious uveitis;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2023-08-29

2. Corticosteroid implants for chronic non-infectious uveitis;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews;2023-01-16

3. The Use of Polymer Blends in the Treatment of Ocular Diseases;Pharmaceutics;2022-07-07

4. OCULAR DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS: A REVIEW;FARMACIA;2021-12-24

5. Implantable Devices to Treat Ophthalmic Conditions: Drug Delivery Systems;Ophthalmic Product Development;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3