Systematic Review of Medication Errors in Pediatric Patients

Author:

Ghaleb Maisoon Abdullah1,Barber Nick2,Franklin Bryony D3,Yeung Vincent WS4,Khaki Zahra F4,Wong Ian CK5

Affiliation:

1. University of London & the Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, England; Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London, London

2. Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London

3. Academic Pharmacy Unit, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust/Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London

4. Centre for Paediatric Pharmacy Research, The School of Pharmacy, University of London & the Institute of Child Health, University College London

5. University of London & the Institute of Child Health, University College London

Abstract

Objective: To systematically locate and review studies that have investigated the incidence of medication errors (MEs) in pediatric inpatients and identify common errors. Methods: A systematic search of studies related to MEs in children was performed using the following databases: MEDLINE (1951–April 2006), EMBASE (1966–April 2006), Pharm-line (1978–April 2006), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–April 2006), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1982–April 2006), and British Nursing Index (1994–April 2006). Studies of the incidence and nature of MEs in pediatrics were included. The title, abstract, or full article was reviewed for relevance; any study not related to MEs in children was excluded. Results: Three methods were used to detect MEs in the studies reviewed: spontaneous reporting (n = 10), medication order or chart review (n = 14), or observation (n = 8). There was great variation in the definitions of ME used and the error rates reported. The most common type of ME was dosing error, often involving 10 times the actual dose required. Antibiotics and sedatives were the most common classes of drugs associated with MEs; these are probably among the most common drugs prescribed. Conclusions: Interpretation of the literature was hindered by variation in definitions employed by different researchers, varying research methods and setting, and a lack of theory-based research. Overall, it would appear that our initial concern about MEs in pediatrics has been validated; however, we do not know the actual size of the problem. Further work to determine the incidence and causes of MEs in pediatrics is urgently needed, as well as evaluation of the best interventions to reduce them.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 190 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3