Efficacy and Safety of Mirtazapine in Fibromyalgia Syndrome Patients: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study

Author:

Yeephu Suwimon1,Suthisisang Chuthamanee2,Suttiruksa Saithip3,Prateepavanich Pradit4,Limampai Patchara5,Russell Irwin Jon6

Affiliation:

1. Suwimon Yeephu BPharm MSc (clinical pharmacy), PhD Candidate; Assistant Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Mahidol University, Rajthevee, Bangkok, Thailand

2. Chuthamanee Suthisisang BPharm PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Mahidol University

3. Saithip Suttiruksa BPharm MPharm, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Mahidol University

4. Pradit Prateepavanich MD Dip Thai Board of Rehabilitation Medicine, Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

5. Patchara Limampai BSN MA, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

6. Irwin Jon Russell MD PhD, Associate Professor and ACR Master Faculty (retired), the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Director, Fibromyalgia Research and Consulting, Arthritis and Osteoporosis Center of South Texas, San Antonio

Abstract

BACKGROUND Data from an open-label trial suggest that mirtazapine might prove useful in treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). OBJECTIVE To obtain preliminary efficacy data of mirtazapine for estimation of sample size requirements for a Phase 2 clinical trial in FMS. METHODS This 13-week randomized controlled trial compared the effects of mirtazapine 15 mg/day, mirtazapine 30 mg/day, and placebo in 40 patients with FMS. The primary outcomes were change in Pain Visual Analog Scale (PVAS) and proportion of pain responders (≥30% PVAS reduction). Secondary outcomes included scores from the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Patient Global Assessment, and self-reported adverse events. RESULTS Significant within-group PVAS reductions from baseline were observed in all 3 groups, with the greatest improvement in the mirtazapine 30-mg group (p < 0.005); between-group difference was not significant. The proportion of pain responders did not meet significance criteria (66.67% for mirtazapine 30 mg, 50% for mirtazapine 15 mg, 41.67% for placebo). Significant within-group improvement in JSS scores was seen for mirtazapine 30 mg (p < 0.01) and mirtazapine 15 mg (p < 0.05). Between-group comparison achieved significance for JSS item 3, waking several times per night (p < 0.05). On the PGIC, 72.73% felt better with both mirtazapine dosages compared with 50% for placebo. Within-group FIQ responses indicated improvement in only mirtazapine-treated groups, whereas within-group improvement for HAM-D and Patient Global Assessment was observed in all groups. Based on our findings, the sample size requirement (80% power, 5% type I error) should be 83 per group to detect PVAS change difference between mirtazapine 30 mg and placebo. Common mirtazapine-related adverse events were increased appetite and weight gain. CONCLUSIONS Patients with FMS taking mirtazapine exhibited within-group significant improvement in most of the measured outcomes. Between-group analysis was predictably compromised by the small sample size. Mirtazapine was well tolerated. Further study with a larger sample size is likely to be useful.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3