Interobserver Variability in Assessment of Depth of Submucosal Invasion for Colonic Endoscopic Resections Among Subspecialized Gastrointestinal Pathologists

Author:

Karamchandani Dipti M.1,Westerhoff Maria2,Arnold Christina A.3,Gonzalez Raul S.4,Westbrook Lindsey M.3,Goetz Lianna5,King Tonya S.6,Panarelli Nicole C.7

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Pathology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (Karamchandani).

2. From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Westerhoff).

3. From the Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Aurora (Arnold, Westbrook).

4. From the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Gonzalez).

5. From the Department of Pathology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas (Goetz).

6. From the Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania (King).

7. From the Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York (Panarelli). Karamchandani is currently in the Department of Pathology at UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Abstract

Context.— Recent data support that low-risk submucosally invasive (pT1) colonic adenocarcinomas (ie, completely resected tumors that lack high-grade morphology, tumor budding, and lymphovascular invasion) are considered cured via endoscopic resection, provided that the submucosal invasion is less than 1000 μm. Hence, the pathologists' assessment of depth of submucosal invasion may guide further management (ie, surveillance versus colectomy). Objective.— To assess interobserver concordance among gastrointestinal pathologists in measuring submucosal depth of invasion in colonic endoscopic resections. Design.— Six gastrointestinal pathologists from 5 academic centers independently measured the greatest depth of submucosal invasion in micrometers on 52 hematoxylin-eosin–stained slides from colonic endoscopic specimens with pT1 adenocarcinomas, per published guidelines (round 1 scoring). Two separate measurements (round 2 scoring) were subsequently performed by each pathologist following a consensus meeting, (1) from the surface of the lesion and (2) from the muscularis mucosae, and pathologists were asked to choose their (3) “real-life (best)” assessment between the first 2 measurements. Interobserver agreement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen κ statistics. Results.— Round 1 had poor ICC (0.43; 95% CI, 0.31–0.56). Round 2 agreement was good when measuring from the surface (ICC = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76–0.88) but moderate (ICC = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47–0.70) when measuring from the muscularis mucosae and became poor (ICC = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36–0.61) for the best-assessment measurement. Conclusions.— Our findings indicate that clearer and reproducible guidelines are needed if clinical colleagues are to base important management decisions on pathologists' estimate of the depth of submucosal invasion in colonic endoscopic resections.

Publisher

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Subject

Medical Laboratory Technology,General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3