Rapid Onsite Evaluation for Specimen Adequacy and Triage of Breast Masses in a Low-Resource Setting

Abstract

Context.— Rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) is critical in determining sample adequacy and triaging cytology samples. Although fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the primary method of initial tissue sampling in Tanzania, ROSE is not practiced. Objective.— To investigate the performance of ROSE in determining cellular adequacy and providing preliminary diagnoses in breast FNAB in a low-resource setting. Design.— Patients with breast masses were recruited prospectively from the FNAB clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital. Each FNAB was evaluated by ROSE for overall specimen adequacy, cellularity, and preliminary diagnosis. The preliminary interpretation was compared to the final cytologic diagnosis and histologic diagnosis, when available. Results.— Fifty FNAB cases were evaluated, and all were adequate for diagnosis on ROSE and final interpretation. Overall percentage of agreement (OPA) between preliminary and final cytologic diagnosis was 84%, positive percentage of agreement (PPA) was 33%, and negative percentage of agreement (NPA) was 100% (κ = 0.4, P < .001). Twenty-one cases had correlating surgical resections. OPA between preliminary cytologic and histologic diagnoses was 67%, PPA was 22%, and NPA was 100% (κ = 0.2, P = .09). OPA between final cytologic and histologic diagnoses was 95%, PPA was 89%, and NPA was 100% (κ = 0.9, P = <.001). Conclusions.— False-positive rates of ROSE diagnoses for breast FNAB are low. While preliminary cytologic diagnoses had a high false-negative rate, final cytologic diagnoses had overall high concordance with histologic diagnoses. Therefore, the role of ROSE for preliminary diagnosis should be considered carefully in low-resource settings, and it may need to be paired with additional interventions to improve pathologic diagnosis.