THE PROBLEMS OF LEGAL NATURE OF RECOMMENDED CLARIFICATIONS OF ANTIMONOPOLY COMMITTEE OF UKRAINE

Author:

Podtserkovnyi O.P.ORCID, ,Ziatina D.V.ORCID,Khamkhodera O.P.ORCID, ,

Abstract

The article is devoted to the scientific analysis of legal nature of recommendation clarifications of Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine. The detailed attention is paid to the thorough investigation of provisions of Recommended Clarifications of Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine No. 39-pp August 08th, 2016 that defines the legal approaches of Anti monopoly Committee, which are recommended to apply by its official bodies while defining of fines for violation of legislation on protection of economic competition, including protection from unfair competition, in order to ensure the legal certainty and predictability of application of legal provisions. On the basis of scientific research, the conclusion is made that recommended clarifications of Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine by their legal nature are the acts of common regulative force that are not the legislative acts, they also cannot create new legal provisions, they belong to the so called “soft law” by means of which the uniformity of interpretation and uniform rules for realization of legal provisions are ensured. The importance of recommendation as interpretation of legal provisions is highlighted, their place in the regulation of legal relations is defined. The main purpose of recommendations is to form the legal opinion of state authority abot the content and the order of execution of legal provisions. The authors make a conclusion that withdrawal of Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine from its own legal position as to the practice of fine calculation, that is prescribed in recommended clarifications, provides the possibility to talk about the violation of one of the major principle of law — the principle of legal certainty. The proper realization of discretional competence is based on the compliance with the requirements of legality and adequacy of law enforcement decisions of empowered officials. With the purpose of improvement of current legislation, it is proposed to approve the Methodology for calculating the amount of fines by the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine for violation of the legislation on protection of economic competition. The adoption of such Methodological guidance for calculation of fines will increase the efficiency of national regulative provisions and goes completely in line with the provisions of Association Agreement between the European Union and Ukraine.

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)

Reference20 articles.

1. 1. Shchodo zastosuvannia polozhen chastyny druhoi, piatoi ta shostoi statti 52 Zakonu Ukrainy "Pro zakhyst ekonomichnoi konkurentsii", chastyn pershoi ta druhoi statti 21 Zakonu Ukrainy "Pro zakhyst vid nedobrosovisnoi konkurentsii": Rekomendatsiini roziasnennia Antymonopolnoho komitetu Ukrainy vid 09.08.2016 № 39-rr. Ofitsiinyi sait Antymonopolnoho komitetu Ukrainy. URL: https://amcu.gov.ua/npas/rekomendacijni-rozyasnennya-shchodozastosuvannya-polozhen-chastin-drugoyi-pyatoyi-ta-shostoyi-statti-52-zakonu-ukrayini-pro-zahist-ekonomichnoyikonkurenciyi-chastin-pershoyi-ta-drugoyi-stat [in Ukrainian].

2. 2. Normatyvno-pravovi akty ministerstv, inshykh tsentralnykh orhaniv vykonavchoi vlady, pravovi aspekty yikh vykonannia ta zastosuvannia. Ofitsiinyi sait Ministrerstva yustytsii Ukrainy. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/m/normativnopravovi-akti-ministerstv-inshih-tsentralnih-organiv-vikonavchoi-vladi-pravovi-aspekti-ih-vikonannya-tazastosuvannya [in Ukrainian].

3. 3. Koval V.M. Problemy zastosuvannia norm materialnoho prava v hospodarskomu sudochynstvi. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura, 2011. 528 p. [in Ukrainian].

4. 4. Rabinovych P.M. Osnovy zahalnoi teorii prava ta derzhavy. Lviv: Krai, 2007. 192 p. [in Ukrainian].

5. 5. Melnychuk S.M. Interpretatsiino-pravova forma realizatsii funktsii suchasnoi derzhavy Ukraina. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. 2018. No. 6. P. 41-44. URL: http://www.lsej.org.ua/6_2018/10.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3