Discursive practices of deliberative democracy in Ukrainian society

Author:

Yermolenko AnatoliyORCID, ,Bauman YuriiORCID,Kiryukhin DenysORCID,Lazorenko OlenaORCID,Nadolny MykolaORCID,Nechiporenko VitaliyORCID,Shamrai ViktoriiaORCID,Shcherbak SvitlanaORCID, , , , , , ,

Abstract

The author’s group aimed to carry out a socio-philosophical analysis of the processes of the formation of institutions of deliberative democracy in Ukraine, in particular, to reveal the complex and contradictory nature of the processes of distortion of communications in Ukrainian society, which take the form of simulative and imitative practices, when instead of argumentative discourses, quasi-communications aimed at to achieve not the argumentative consensus of citizens, but the goals and ensuring the interests of individual social groups. The research will show paradigmatic changes in modern social philosophy, accordingly, the concepts of deliberative democracy, communicative philosophy, and discursive ethics will be used, taking into account their methodological limits. The authors of the monograph sought to find out, first of all, the following questions: what are the peculiarities of the deliberative democracy of Ukrainian society from the perspective of European integration? What is the ratio of deliberative and representative types of democracy given the development of existing institutions of civil society in Ukraine; what is the identification of the contradictory character and intellectual potential of discursive practices in the process of formation of institutions of deliberative democracy in Ukrainian society and what contradictions await Ukrainian society on this path. In the search for answers to these questions and as a result of the research, the concept of the institutional formation of deliberative democracy in Ukrainian society was substantiated in the light of discussions about the current state of democracy in the world. The recommendations were formulated for the future development of discursive practices through the creation of institutions of deliberative democracy. The scientific novelty of the study is that it analyzes for the first time the intellectual and critical potential of discourse as a factor in the formation of deliberative democracy in Ukraine. The methodological basis of the research is transcendental-pragmatic, comparatives, phenomenological, system-functional, and analytical methods.

Publisher

PH "Naukova Dumka"

Reference61 articles.

1. Apel, K.-O. (1973). Transformation der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

2. Apel, K.-O. (1988). Diskurs und Verantwortung. Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

3. Apel, K.-O. (1998). Praktische Philosophie als Diskurs und Verantwortungsethik (Zweiter Vortrag) In: Apel K.‑O., Hösle V., Simon-Schaefer R. Globalisierung. Herausforderung für die Philosophie. Bamberg: Universitäts-Verlag.

4. Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy» in Seyla Benhabib (ed.). Democracy and Difference. Princeton. pp. 67-94.

5. Bessette, J. (1980). Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government. How democratic is the constitution? Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. P. 102-116. Access mode: https://www.econbiz.de/Record/deliberative-democracy-the-majority-principle-in-republican-government-bessette-joseph/10001898473 (access date:5.04.2019)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3