Digitalization of the public sphere as the basis for the institutionalization of socio-political activity online

Author:

Hetman YuliiaORCID

Abstract

Socio-political participation online is of great importance for the development of democracy, so the study of the institutionalization of online activity is extremely relevant. Given the digitalization of all spheres of life, it is advisable to study the processes of institutionalization of online activity taking into account the features of metamodern society, as well as taking into account the transformation of social values and norms. A significant role in the legitimization of online activity is played by citizens' appropriation of the public sphere, as well as its dynamic digitalization, which directly affects the expansion of public participation and involvement of a much wider audience in the socio-political process. Therefore, the article analyzes the role of the digital public sphere in the development of online activity is analyzed, the research approach to the concept of institutionalization as a whole is defined. The process of institutionalization of social and political online activity in Ukraine is also analyzed. The article also notes that the institutional infrastructure, as well as the legality of socio-political online activity, is provided by the state, but the question is whether Ukrainians accept new social requirements, rules, and norms that are formed in the conditions of digitalization of social life.

Publisher

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)

Reference17 articles.

1. Bevzenko, L. (2022). Complexity Theory in sociological theorizing and metamodern culture — the contours of mutual legitimation. [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 1, 45–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2022.01.045. [= Бевзенко 2022]

2. Boiko, N. (2021). Digitalization of Ukrainian society: The shifts that have happened in recent decades. [In Ukrainian]. Ukrainian society: Monitoring social changes 30 years of independence, 8 (22), 534–549. [= Бойко 2021]

3. Burlachuk, V. (2018). The Ghost of Freedom. The Fate of Democratic Institutions in Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 2, 186–203. [= Бурлачук 2018]

4. Golovakha, Ye., Panina N. (2001). Post-Soviet deinstitutionalization and the formation of new social institutions in Ukrainian society. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing, 4, 5–22. [= Головаха, Паніна 2001]

5. KIIS (2022). Democracy, rights and freedoms of citizens and media consumption in the conditions of war: results of the KIIS survey for Opora. August 17, 2022. [In Ukrainian]. URL: https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1132&page=1. [= КМІС 2022]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3