Author:
Alexander Ross,Blakefield Mary,Frank Katherine,Pomper Markus
Abstract
Abstract
This study highlights the efforts of Indiana University East to make substantive changes to its general education program, resulting primarily from state mandates and legislation, on an extremely aggressive timeline. While fraught with challenges, these legislative mandates also presented opportunities for the institution to make necessary and impactful improvements to its general education curriculum, policies, and procedures that may not have occurred without the looming deadlines and requirements of the legislation. Indiana is one of several states that have enacted and implemented similar legislation, causing curricular and procedural change in general education programs throughout the nation. While often difficult to manage, these legislative measures can be viewed as opportunities at institutions, like Indiana University East, that desperately needed general education reform.
Publisher
The Pennsylvania State University Press
Reference9 articles.
1. Boswell, K. (2004). Bridges or barriers? Public policy and the community college transfer function. Change, 36(6), 22–29.
2. Chronicle of Higher Education. (2010). College completion: Who graduates from college, who doesn't, and why it matters. Retrieved from http://collegecompletion.chronicle.com/state/#state=IN§or=public_four.
3. Indiana Commission for Higher Education. (2012). Indiana Statewide Transfer General Education Core. Retrieved from http://www.in.gov/che/files/stgec_Guidance_13May22.pdf.
4. Indiana University East. (2013). Campus Learning Outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.iue.edu/academics/assessment/documents/IUE_Learning_Outcomes.pdf.
5. Lingenfelter, P. E. (2007). State policies and planning to increase attainment, quality, and productivity. New Directions for Higher Education, 140, 29–39.