Author:
Oreskes Naomi,Stainforth David A.,Smith Leonard A.
Abstract
Scientific experts have confirmed that anthropogenic warming is underway, and some degree of adaptation is now unavoidable. However, the details of impacts on the scale of climate change at which humans would have to prepare for and adjust to them are still the subject of considerable research, inquiry, and debate. Planning for adaptation requires information on the scale over which human organizations and institutions have authority and capacity, yet the general circulation models lack forecasting skill at these scales, and attempts to “downscale” climate models are still in the early stages of development. Because we do not know what adaptations will be required, we cannot say whether they will be harder or easier—more expensive or less—than emissions control. Whatever improvements in regional predictive capacity may come about in the future, the lack of current predictive capacity on the relevant scale is a strong argument for why we must both control greenhouse gas emissions and prepare to adapt.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference48 articles.
1. Schelling, Thomas C. 1980. Letter to Climate Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, April 18, National Academies Archives, Washington, DC.
2. Hansen, James E. . 2006. “The Threat to the Planet.” New York Review of Books, http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19131.
3. Ethics and Global Climate Change
4. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases
5. Christensen, Jens H. , et al. 2007. “Regional Climate Projections.” In Solomon et al., 849–940.
Cited by
49 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献