Abstract
A number of recent biologists have used multilevel selection theory to help explain the major transitions in evolution. I argue that in doing so, they have shifted from a ‘synchronic’ to a ‘diachronic’ formulation of the levels of selection question. The implications of this shift in perspective are explored, in relation to an ambiguity in the meaning of multilevel selection. Though the ambiguity is well-known, it has never before been discussed in the context of the major transitions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference21 articles.
1. Multilevel Selection and the Partitioning of Covariance: A Comparison of Three Approaches;Okasha;Multilevel Selection and the Partitioning of Covariance: A Comparison of Three Approaches,2004
2. The Units of Evolutionary Transition;Griesemer;The Units of Evolutionary Transition,2000
3. Alternative formulations of multilevel selection
Cited by
99 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献